Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38953114›Full record

ArticleAnnals of laboratory medicine2024

Evaluating the Commutability of Reference Materials for α-Fetoprotein: Accurate Value Assignment With Multiple Systems and Trueness Verification.

Jianping Zhang, Jing Zhao, Qingtao Wang, Rui Zhang, Yuhong Yue

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of laboratory medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jianping ZhangDepartment of Clinical Laboratory, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital Medical University; Beijing Center for Clinical Laboratories, Beijing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-4766-1322
Jing ZhaoDepartment of Clinical Laboratory, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital Medical University; Beijing Center for Clinical Laboratories, Beijing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-8916-5567
Qingtao WangDepartment of Clinical Laboratory, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital Medical University; Beijing Center for Clinical Laboratories, Beijing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5291-585X
Rui ZhangDepartment of Clinical Laboratory, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital Medical University; Beijing Center for Clinical Laboratories, Beijing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7258-8745
Yuhong YueDepartment of Clinical Laboratory, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital Medical University; Beijing Center for Clinical Laboratories, Beijing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5141-2513

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The accurate measurement of α-fetoprotein (AFP) is critical for clinical diagnosis. However, different AFP immunoassays may yield different results. Appropriate AFP reference materials (RMs) were selected and assigned accurate values for applications with external quality assessment (EQA) programs to standardize AFP measurements. Methods: Forty individual clinical samples and six different concentrations of candidate RMs (Can-RMs, L1-L6) were prepared by the Beijing Center for Clinical Laboratories. The Can-RMs were assigned target values by performing five immunoassays, using WHO International Standard 72/225 as a calibrator, and sent to 45 clinical laboratories in Beijing for AFP measurements. The commutability of all RMs was assessed based on CLSI and the International Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (IFCC) approaches. Analytical performance was assessed for compliance based on accuracy (total error, TE), trueness (bias), and precision (CV). Results: The Can-RMs were commutable for all immunoassays using the CLSI approach and for 6 of 10 assay combinations using the IFCC approach. RMs diluted in WHO RM 72/225 were commutable among all assays with the CLSI approach, except for serum matrix (Autolumo vs. Roche analyzer) and diluted water matrix (Abbott vs. Roche/Mindray analyzer), whereas some inconclusive and non-commutable results were found using the IFCC approach. The average pass rates based on the TE, bias, and CV were 91%, 81%, and 95%, respectively. Conclusions: The commutability of the RMs differed between both evaluation approaches. The Can-RMs exhibited good commutability with the CLSI approach, suggesting their suitability for use with that approach as commutable EQA materials with assigned values and for monitoring the performance of AFP measurements.

Indexed as

alpha-FetoproteinsReference StandardsCalibrationHumansImmunoassayLaboratories, ClinicalQuality ControlAFP protein, humanalpha-FetoproteinsAlpha-fetoproteinCommutabilityExternal quality assessmentImmunoassayReference standard

Identifiers

PMID38953114
PMCPMC11375202

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.