Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38953087›Full record

ReviewCureus2024

From the Intensive Care Unit to Recovery: Managing Post-intensive Care Syndrome in Critically Ill Patients.

Mfonido Ekong, Tejbir Singh Monga, Jean Carlo Daher, Mutyala Sashank, Setareh Reza Soltani, Nkiruka Lauretta Nwangene, Cara Mohammed, Fellipe Feijo Halfeld, Leen AlShelh, Fernanda Ayumi Fukuya and 1 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Mfonido EkongInternal Medicine, St. George's University School of Medicine, True Blue, GRD.
Tejbir Singh MongaInternal Medicine, Spartan Health Science University, Vieux Fort, LCA.
Jean Carlo DaherMedicine, Lakeland Regional Health, Lakeland, USA.
Mutyala SashankInternal Medicine, Davao Medical School Foundation Inc., Davao, PHL.
Setareh Reza SoltaniAdvanced Diagnostic & Interventional Radiology Center (ADIR), Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, IRN.
Nkiruka Lauretta NwangeneInternal Medicine, Campbell University, Buies Creek, USA.
Cara MohammedOrthopaedic Surgery, Sangre Grande Hospital, Sangre Grande, TTO.
Fellipe Feijo HalfeldInternal Medicine, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, BRA.
Leen AlShelhInternal Medicine, Medical University of Lublin, Lublin, POL.
Fernanda Ayumi FukuyaInternal Medicine, University of Mogi das Cruzes (UMC), Sao Paulo, BRA.
Manju RaiBiotechnology, Shri Venkateshwara University, Punjab, IND.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Post-intensive care syndrome (PICS) is the term used to describe the decline in the physical, cognitive, and/or mental condition of individuals who have been discharged from the intensive care unit (ICU). This complication could result in a significant reduction in quality of life, with some patients experiencing symptoms of prolonged weakness, depression, anxiety, and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Intensive care advancement over the years has resulted in an increase in ICU survival rates and a proportional increase in PICS, creating a need for more in-depth research into the prevention and management of the disease. Hence, this study aims to examine the present body of literature on PICS, encompassing its underlying physiological processes and elements that contribute to its development, methods for evaluating and diagnosing the condition, current treatment choices as well as potential new approaches, and the constraints in managing PICS and the necessity for further investigation. In this article, studies were compiled from several databases, including, but not limited to, Google Scholar, PubMed, and Cochrane Library. These studies were reviewed, and their data were used to highlight important aspects regarding the efficacy of current PICS screening tools, the optimization and limitations of both pharmacologic and non-pharmacologic treatment methods, and the feasibility and safety of emerging treatments and technologies. The major conclusions of this review were centered around the need for multidisciplinary management of PICS. From pharmacological management using analgesia to non-pharmacological management using early mobilization and exercise therapy, the effective treatment of PICS requires a multifaceted approach. Patient follow-up and its importance were touched upon, including strategies and policies to bolster proper follow-up, thereby increasing favorable outcomes. Lastly, the importance of family involvement and the increased need for research into this topic were highlighted.

Indexed as

assessment scalescognitive impairmentcritically ill patientsmental healthmultidisciplinary approachphysical therapypost-intensive care syndrome (pics)quality of liferehabilitationscreening tools

Identifiers

PMID38953087
PMCPMC11215031

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.