ReviewCureus2024
Quantitative Angiography: The Dawn of a New Era in Cardiovascular Medicine.
Review in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This comprehensive review explores the transformative role of quantitative angiography in the landscape of cardiovascular medicine. Tracing the historical evolution of cardiovascular diagnostics, we emphasize the significance of angiography in diagnosis and treatment. The primary focus on quantitative angiography reveals its capacity to move beyond qualitative assessments, providing clinicians with precise measurements and objective parameters. This paradigm shift enhances diagnostic accuracy, promising far-reaching implications for the future of cardiovascular medicine. The ability to tailor interventions based on meticulous measurements optimizes therapeutic strategies and positions the field on the brink of a new era where personalized approaches become the norm. However, challenges such as image quality, radiation exposure, and interpretation variability persist, necessitating a collective call to action for continued research and development. As we confront these issues, collaborative efforts across disciplines are essential to refine existing technologies and usher in innovative solutions. This review concludes with a resounding call for ongoing research initiatives, large-scale clinical studies, and collective commitment to propel quantitative angiography into a universally accepted standard, ensuring its full realization in enhancing patient care and outcomes in cardiovascular medicine.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.