Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38953038›Full record

ArticleTransplantation direct2024

Randomized Controlled Trial of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Protocols in Live Kidney Donors: ERASKT Study.

Jacob Saks, Uzung Yoon, Natalie Neiswinter, Eric S Schwenk, Stephen Goldberg, Linh Nguyen, Marc C Torjman, Elia Elia, Ashesh Shah

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Transplantation direct, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Jacob SaksDepartment of Anesthesiology, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA.
Uzung YoonDepartment of Anesthesiology, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4638-4161
Natalie NeiswinterDepartment of Anesthesiology, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA.
Eric S SchwenkDepartment of Anesthesiology, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA.
Stephen GoldbergDepartment of Anesthesiology, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA.
Linh NguyenSidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA.
Marc C TorjmanDepartment of Anesthesiology, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA.
Elia EliaDepartment of Anesthesiology, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA.
Ashesh ShahDepartment of Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) pathways represent a comprehensive approach to optimizing perioperative management and reducing hospital stay and cost. In living donor kidney transplantation, key impediments to postoperative discharge include pain, and opioid associated complications such as nausea, vomiting, and the return of gastrointestinal function. Methods: In this randomized controlled trial, living kidney transplantation donors were assigned to either the ERAS or control group. The ERAS group patients received 15 preoperative, 17 intraoperative, 19 postoperative element intervention. The control group received standard care. The ERAS group received a multimodal opioid sparing pain management including an intraoperative transverse abdominis plane block. Our primary outcome measure was postoperative opioid consumption. The secondary outcome measures were postoperative pain scores, first oral intake, and hospital length of stay. Results: There were no significant differences in demographics between the 2 groups. The ERAS group had a statistically significant reduction in total postoperative opioid consumption calculated in intravenous morphine equivalents (24.2 ± 20.2 versus 71 ± 39.5 mg, Conclusions: The ERAS group experienced superior postoperative analgesia and a shorter length of hospital stay compared with controls.

Identifiers

PMID38953038
PMCPMC11216682

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.