Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38952894›Full record

ArticleThe journal of allergy and clinical immunology. Global2024

Predictive genetic panel for adult asthma using machine learning methods.

Luciano Gama da Silva Gomes, Álvaro Augusto Souza da Cruz, Maria Borges Rabêlo de Santana, Gabriela Pimentel Pinheiro, Cinthia Vila Nova Santana, Carolina Barbosa Souza Santos, Meher Preethi Boorgula, Monica Campbell, Adelmir de Souza Machado, Rafael Valente Veiga and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The journal of allergy and clinical immunology. Global, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Luciano Gama da Silva GomesInstituto de Ciências da Saúde, Universidade Federal da Bahia, Salvador, Bahia, Brazil.
Álvaro Augusto Souza da CruzPrograma de Controle da Asma na Bahia (ProAR), Universidade Federal da Bahia, Salvador, Bahia, Brazil.
Maria Borges Rabêlo de SantanaInstituto de Ciências da Saúde, Universidade Federal da Bahia, Salvador, Bahia, Brazil.
Gabriela Pimentel PinheiroPrograma de Controle da Asma na Bahia (ProAR), Universidade Federal da Bahia, Salvador, Bahia, Brazil.
Cinthia Vila Nova SantanaPrograma de Controle da Asma na Bahia (ProAR), Universidade Federal da Bahia, Salvador, Bahia, Brazil.
Carolina Barbosa Souza SantosPrograma de Controle da Asma na Bahia (ProAR), Universidade Federal da Bahia, Salvador, Bahia, Brazil.
Meher Preethi BoorgulaDepartment of Medicine, University of Colorado Denver, Aurora, Colo.
Monica CampbellDepartment of Medicine, University of Colorado Denver, Aurora, Colo.
Adelmir de Souza MachadoInstituto de Ciências da Saúde, Universidade Federal da Bahia, Salvador, Bahia, Brazil.
Rafael Valente VeigaLaboratory of Lymphocyte Signalling and Development, The Babraham Institute, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Kathleen C BarnesDepartment of Medicine, University of Colorado Denver, Aurora, Colo.
Ryan Dos Santos CostaInstituto de Ciências da Saúde, Universidade Federal da Bahia, Salvador, Bahia, Brazil.
Camila Alexandrina FigueiredoInstituto de Ciências da Saúde, Universidade Federal da Bahia, Salvador, Bahia, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Asthma is a chronic inflammatory disease of the airways that is heterogeneous and multifactorial, making its accurate characterization a complex process. Therefore, identifying the genetic variations associated with asthma and discovering the molecular interactions between the omics that confer risk of developing this disease will help us to unravel the biological pathways involved in its pathogenesis. Objective: We sought to develop a predictive genetic panel for asthma using machine learning methods. Methods: We tested 3 variable selection methods: Boruta's algorithm, the top 200 genome-wide association study markers according to their respective Results: Two variable selection methods, Boruta and genome-wide association studies, were statistically similar in terms of the average accuracies generated, whereas elastic net had the worst overall performance. The predictive genetic panel was completed with 155 single-nucleotide variants, with 91.18% accuracy, 92.75% sensitivity, and 89.55% specificity using the support vector machine algorithm. The markers used range from known single-nucleotide variants to those not previously described in the literature. Our study shows potential in creating genetic prediction panels with tailored penalties per marker, aiding in the identification of optimal machine learning methods for intricate results. Conclusions: This method is able to classify asthma and nonasthma effectively, proving its potential utility in clinical prediction and diagnosis.

Indexed as

Asthmageneticsmachine learningpredictionsingle-nucleotide variants

Identifiers

PMID38952894
PMCPMC11215340

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.