Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38952849›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in plant science2024

Muhammad Qadir, Anwar Hussain, Mohib Shah, Muhammad Hamayun, Amjad Iqbal, Muhammad Irshad, Ayaz Ahmad, Abdulwahed Fahad Alrefaei, Sajid Ali

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Muhammad QadirDepartment of Botany, Abdul Wali Khan University, Mardan, Pakistan.
Anwar HussainDepartment of Botany, Abdul Wali Khan University, Mardan, Pakistan.
Mohib ShahDepartment of Botany, Abdul Wali Khan University, Mardan, Pakistan.
Muhammad HamayunDepartment of Botany, Abdul Wali Khan University, Mardan, Pakistan.
Amjad IqbalDepartment of Food Science and Technology, Abdul Wali Khan University, Mardan, Pakistan.
Muhammad IrshadDepartment of Botany, Abdul Wali Khan University, Mardan, Pakistan.
Ayaz AhmadDepartment of Biotechnology, Abdul Wali Khan University, Mardan, Pakistan.
Abdulwahed Fahad AlrefaeiDepartment of Zoology, College of Science, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Sajid AliDepartment of Horticulture and Life Science, Yeungnam University, Gyeongsan, Republic of Korea.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Arsenate, a metalloid, acting as an analog to phosphate, has a tendency to accumulate more readily in plant species, leading to adverse effects. Methods: In the current study, sunflower seedlings were exposed to 25, 50 and 100 ppm of the arsenic. Results: Likewise, a notable reduction (p<0.05) was observed in the relative growth rate (RGR) by 4-folds and net assimilation rate (NAR) by 75% of Conclusion: The strain exhibited the capability to concurrently encourage plant growth and remediate Ascontaminated growth media through 2-folds rate of biotransformation and bio-mobilization.

Indexed as

arsenicarsenic bioremediationboosted antioxidant systemplant growth promotionStaphylococcus arlettae

Identifiers

PMID38952849
PMCPMC11216036

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.