ArticleBMJ neurology open2024
Classifying and quantifying changes in papilloedema using machine learning.
Article in BMJ neurology open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Automated Retinal Vascular Analysis Reveals Response to Acetazolamide in Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension.Translational vision science & technology · 2025Trial
- Artificial Intelligence in the Detection of Papilledema: A Systematic Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Multimodal Deep Learning Differentiates Papilledema and Non-Arteritic Anterior Ischemic Optic Neuropathy From Healthy Eyes.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2026Article
- Review
- Detecting papilloedema as a marker of raised intracranial pressure using artificial intelligence: A systematic review.PLOS digital health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Machine learning (ML) can differentiate papilloedema from normal optic discs using fundus photos. Currently, papilloedema severity is assessed using the descriptive, ordinal Frisén scale. We hypothesise that ML can quantify papilloedema and detect a treatment effect on papilloedema due to idiopathic intracranial hypertension. Methods: We trained a convolutional neural network to assign a Frisén grade to fundus photos taken from the Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension Treatment Trial (IIHTT). We applied modified subject-based fivefold cross-validation to grade 2979 longitudinal images from 158 participants' study eyes (ie, the eye with the worst mean deviation) in the IIHTT. Compared with the human expert-determined grades, we hypothesise that ML-estimated grades can also demonstrate differential changes over time in the IIHTT study eyes between the treatment (acetazolamide (ACZ) plus diet) and placebo (diet only) groups. Findings: The average ML-determined grade correlated strongly with the reference standard (r=0.76, p<0.001; mean absolute error=0.54). At the presentation, treatment groups had similar expert-determined and ML-determined Frisén grades. The average ML-determined grade for the ACZ group (1.7, 95% CI 1.5 to 1.8) was significantly lower (p=0.0003) than for the placebo group (2.3, 95% CI 2.0 to 2.5) at the 6-month trial outcome. Interpretation: Supervised ML of fundus photos quantified the degree of papilloedema and changes over time reflecting the effects of ACZ. Given the increasing availability of fundus photography, neurologists will be able to use ML to quantify papilloedema on a continuous scale that incorporates the features of the Frisén grade to monitor interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.