ArticleTobacco induced diseases2024
The effect of active and passive smoking during pregnancy on birth outcomes: A cohort study in Shanghai.
Article in Tobacco induced diseases, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Longitudinal Assessment of Oxidative Stress Biomarkers During Physiological Pregnancy and Their Relevance for Maternal Healthcare.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- A Bayesian multilevel joint model for predicting neonatal head circumference and body mass index: a case study in Dalahu County, Iran.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2026Article
- Impact of Secondhand Smoke on the Biomineralization of Dental Enamel in Rats.Calcified tissue international · 2026Article
- Interaction between maternal CRP levels and diabetes on preterm delivery risk: a retrospective observation study.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2026Observational
- The Consequences of Prenatal Tobacco Exposure: A Systematic Review of Birth Outcomes and Developmental Trajectories.Cureus · 2026Review
- Association between seasonal influenza vaccination and neonatal outcomes in Shanghai, China.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2025Article
- Secondhand Smoke Exposure Timing Triggers Distinct Placental Responses in Mouse Pregnancy.Cells · 2025Article
- Associations Between Secondhand Smoke Exposure During Pregnancy and Preterm Birth.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Associations of Involuntary Smoking with Non-Suicidal Self-Injury and Suicidal Behaviors in Early Adulthood.Toxics · 2025Article
- Association of secondhand smoke exposure during pregnancy with left ventricle structure and function in offspring at 4 years old: a prospective birth cohort study.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionChina is the largest tobacco consumer in the world, and tobacco poses a serious threat to the health of pregnant women. However, there are relatively few domestic studies on smoking during pregnancy and childbirth outcomes among pregnant women. The purpose of this study was to analyze the effect of active and passive smoking on pregnant women and their pregnancy outcomes, providing evidence and recommendations for intervention measures.
methodsThis was a cohort study in Shanghai from April 2021 to September 2023. According to the smoking status of pregnant women, they were divided into three groups: active smokers, passive smokers and non-smokers. A self-designed questionnaire was utilized to conduct the survey, and their pregnancy outcomes were tracked and followed up.
resultsA total of 3446 pregnant women were included in this study, among which 2.1% were active smokers, 43.5% were passive smokers, and 54.4% were non-smokers. The average age of the pregnant women was 29.9 years, and 41.2% had a university degree or higher. The education level of active smokers and passive smokers was significantly lower than that of non-smokers (p<0.05).The average gestational age of non-smokers was 38.6 weeks, and the birth weight was 3283.2 g, which was higher than those of active smokers and passive smokers (p<0.05). Logistic regression analysis showed that passive smoking increased the likelihood of preterm birth (AOR=1.38; 95% CI: 1.05-1.81), low birth weight (AOR=1.53; 95% CI: 1.10-2.12), and intrauterine growth restriction (AOR=1.35; 95% CI: 1.02-1.79), while active smoking increased the likelihood of preterm birth (AOR=2.98; 95% CI: 1.50-5.90), low birth weight (AOR=4.29; 95% CI: 2.07-8.88), intrauterine growth restriction (AOR=2.70; 95% CI: 1.37-5.33) , and birth defects (AOR=2.66; 95% CI: 1.00-6.97).
conclusionsOur findings illustrate that active and passive smoking can lead to adverse pregnancy outcomes. This study provides data on the relationship between smoking during pregnancy and delivery outcomes among pregnant women. In the future, we need more effective strategies to protect pregnant women from the harm of tobacco.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.