Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38952646›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in health services2024

Barriers and facilitators to screen for and address social needs in primary care practices in Maryland: a qualitative study.

Sadaf Kazi, Claire Starling, Arianna Milicia, Bryan Buckley, Rachel Grisham, Emily Gruber, Kristen Miller, Hannah Arem

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in health services, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Assessing Unmet Social Needs in Multiple Sclerosis Care in Australia: A Qualitative Assessment of Feasibility, Barriers and Enablers.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2026
    Article
  6. Veterans' Experiences with a Social Need Intervention.Journal of general internal medicine · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Sadaf KaziNational Center for Human Factors in Healthcare, MedStar Health Research Institute, Washington, DC, United States.
Claire StarlingImplementation Science, Healthcare Delivery Research Program, MedStar Health Research Institute, Hyattsville, MD, United States.
Arianna MiliciaNational Center for Human Factors in Healthcare, MedStar Health Research Institute, Washington, DC, United States.
Bryan BuckleyNational Committee for Quality Assurance, Washington, DC, United States.
Rachel GrishamMaryland Primary Care Program, Maryland Department of Health, Baltimore, MD, United States.
Emily GruberMaryland Primary Care Program, Maryland Department of Health, Baltimore, MD, United States.
Kristen MillerNational Center for Human Factors in Healthcare, MedStar Health Research Institute, Washington, DC, United States.
Hannah AremImplementation Science, Healthcare Delivery Research Program, MedStar Health Research Institute, Hyattsville, MD, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Social needs screening can help modify care delivery to meet patient needs and address non-medical barriers to optimal health. However, there is a need to understand how factors that exist at multiple levels of the healthcare ecosystem influence the collection of these data in primary care settings. Methods: We conducted 20 semi-structured interviews involving healthcare providers and primary care clinic staff who represented 16 primary care practices. Interviews focused on barriers and facilitators to awareness of and assistance for patients' social needs in primary care settings in Maryland. The interviews were coded to abstract themes highlighting barriers and facilitators to conducting social needs screening. The themes were organized through an inductive approach using the socio-ecological model delineating individual-, clinic-, and system-level barriers and facilitators to identifying and addressing patients' social needs. Results: We identified several individual barriers to awareness, including patient stigma about verbalizing social needs, provider frustration at eliciting needs they were unable to address, and provider unfamiliarity with community-based resources to address social needs. Clinic-level barriers to awareness included limited appointment times and connecting patients to appropriate community-based organizations. System-level barriers to awareness included navigating documentation challenges on the electronic health record. Conclusions: Overcoming barriers to effective screening for social needs in primary care requires not only practice- and provider-level process change but also an alignment of community resources and advocacy of policies to redistribute community assets to address social needs.

Indexed as

community resourcesdocumentationpatient stigmaprimary carequalitative methodssocial needs screening

Identifiers

PMID38952646
PMCPMC11215188

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.