Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38952611›Full record

ArticleCureus2024

Laparoscopic Retrograde Nephrectomy as a Troubleshooting Technique to Prevent Open Conversion: The Technique Description With a Review of 40 Cases.

Deerush Kannan, Nandyala Penchala Reddy, Aarthy Paneerselvam, Rajesh Paul, Mathisekaran Thangarasu, Vinayak Rengan, Nitesh Jain

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Deerush KannanUrology, Apollo Hospitals, Chennai, IND.
Nandyala Penchala ReddyUrology, Apollo Hospitals, Chennai, IND.
Aarthy PaneerselvamUrology, Apollo Hospitals, Chennai, IND.
Rajesh PaulUrology, Apollo Hospitals, Chennai, IND.
Mathisekaran ThangarasuUrology, Apollo Hospitals, Chennai, IND.
Vinayak RenganSurgery, Apollo Hospitals, Chennai, IND.
Nitesh JainUrology, Apollo Hospitals, Chennai, IND.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction Laparoscopic nephrectomies are safe, with low complication rates in skilled hands. However, traditional approaches may be unsuitable for conditions such as post-renal abscesses, long-standing urinomas, non-functioning kidneys post-pyeloplasty, pyelolithotomies, post-partial nephrectomy recurrences, tuberculous kidneys, pyelonephritis, and redo-renal surgeries. This study describes a modified retrograde nephrectomy technique and its outcomes in 40 cases. Methods We reviewed 40 cases where the retrograde nephrectomy technique was used. Surgeons opted for this method based on intraoperative findings and initial difficulties in accessing the lower pole area. Results Traditional dissection was challenging due to adhesions in the lower pole. The retrograde technique, starting from the renal hilum, allowed early ligation of renal arteries and veins, reducing bleeding risks and facilitating safer caudal dissection. Conclusions The retrograde nephrectomy technique offers a safer and more efficient alternative for complex nephrectomies. Early vascular control minimizes hemorrhage risk, making it a valuable method in challenging renal surgeries.

Indexed as

difficult nephrectomygenitourinary tuberculosis (gutb)laparoscopic radical nephrectomyopen nephrectomyrenal tumour

Identifiers

PMID38952611
PMCPMC11216113

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.