Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38952601›Full record

ArticleCureus2024

The Role of ArtificiaI Intelligence in Brain Tumor Diagnosis: An Evaluation of a Machine Learning Model.

Adriel Abraham, Rejath Jose, Nabeel Farooqui, Jonathan Mayer, Jawad Ahmad, Zain Satti, Thomas J Jacob, Faiz Syed, Milan Toma

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Adriel AbrahamDepartment of Internal Medicine, New York Institute of Technology College of Osteopathic Medicine, New York, USA.
Rejath JoseDepartment of Internal Medicine, New York Institute of Technology College of Osteopathic Medicine, New York, USA.
Nabeel FarooquiDepartment of Computer and Information Science, University of Pennsylvania School of Engineering and Applied Science, Philadelphia, USA.
Jonathan MayerDepartment of Clinical Sciences, New York Institute of Technology College of Osteopathic Medicine, New York, USA.
Jawad AhmadDepartment of Clinical Sciences, New York Institute of Technology College of Osteopathic Medicine, New York, USA.
Zain SattiDepartment of Clinical Sciences, New York Institute of Technology College of Osteopathic Medicine, New York, USA.
Thomas J JacobDepartment of Internal Medicine, New York Institute of Technology College of Osteopathic Medicine, New York, USA.
Faiz SyedDepartment of Internal Medicine, New York Institute of Technology College of Osteopathic Medicine, New York, USA.
Milan TomaDepartment of Osteopathic Manipulative Medicine, New York Institute of Technology College of Osteopathic Medicine, New York, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This research study explores of the effectiveness of a machine learning image classification model in the accurate identification of various types of brain tumors. The types of tumors under consideration in this study are gliomas, meningiomas, and pituitary tumors. These are some of the most common types of brain tumors and pose significant challenges in terms of accurate diagnosis and treatment. The machine learning model that is the focus of this study is built on the Google Teachable Machine platform (Alphabet Inc., Mountain View, CA). The Google Teachable Machine is a machine learning image classification platform that is built from Tensorflow, a popular open-source platform for machine learning. The Google Teachable Machine model was specifically evaluated for its ability to differentiate between normal brains and the aforementioned types of tumors in MRI images. MRI images are a common tool in the diagnosis of brain tumors, but the challenge lies in the accurate classification of the tumors. This is where the machine learning model comes into play. The model is trained to recognize patterns in the MRI images that correspond to the different types of tumors. The performance of the machine learning model was assessed using several metrics. These include precision, recall, and F1 score. These metrics were generated from a confusion matrix analysis and performance graphs. A confusion matrix is a table that is often used to describe the performance of a classification model. Precision is a measure of the model's ability to correctly identify positive instances among all instances it identified as positive. Recall, on the other hand, measures the model's ability to correctly identify positive instances among all actual positive instances. The F1 score is a measure that combines precision and recall providing a single metric for model performance. The results of the study were promising. The Google Teachable Machine model demonstrated high performance, with accuracy, precision, recall, and F1 scores ranging between 0.84 and 1.00. This suggests that the model is highly effective in accurately classifying the different types of brain tumors. This study provides insights into the potential of machine learning models in the accurate classification of brain tumors. The findings of this study lay the groundwork for further research in this area and have implications for the diagnosis and treatment of brain tumors. The study also highlights the potential of machine learning in enhancing the field of medical imaging and diagnosis. With the increasing complexity and volume of medical data, machine learning models like the one evaluated in this study could play a crucial role in improving the accuracy and efficiency of diagnoses. Furthermore, the study underscores the importance of continued research and development in this field to further refine these models and overcome any potential limitations or challenges. Overall, the study contributes to the field of medical imaging and machine learning and sets the stage for future research and advancements in this area.

Indexed as

brain tumor classificationf1 scoregliomasgoogle teachable machinemachine learningmedical diagnosismeningiomasmri imagingpituitary tumorsprecision and recall

Identifiers

PMID38952601
PMCPMC11215798

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.