Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38952572›Full record

ArticleClinical epidemiology2024

Using Routinely Collected Electronic Healthcare Record Data to Investigate Fibrotic Multimorbidity in England.

Georgie M Massen, Hannah R Whittaker, Sarah Cook, Gisli Jenkins, Richard J Allen, Louise V Wain, Iain Stewart, Jennifer K Quint, DEMISTIFI consortium

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical epidemiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Georgie M MassenSchool of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-4355-6546
Hannah R WhittakerSchool of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Sarah CookSchool of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-1250-2967
Gisli JenkinsNational Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Richard J AllenDepartment of Population Health Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.
Louise V WainDepartment of Population Health Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.
Iain StewartNational Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Jennifer K QuintSchool of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-0149-4869
DEMISTIFI consortium

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Electronic healthcare records (EHRs) are used to document diagnoses, symptoms, tests, and prescriptions. Though not primarily collected for research purposes, owing to the size of the data as well as the depth of information collected, they have been used extensively to conduct epidemiological research. The Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD) is an EHR database containing representative data of the UK population with regard to age, sex, race, and social deprivation measures. Fibrotic conditions are characterised by excessive scarring, contributing towards organ dysfunction and eventual organ failure. Fibrosis is associated with ageing as well as many other factors, it is hypothesised that fibrotic conditions are caused by the same underlying pathological mechanism. We calculated the prevalence of fibrotic conditions (as defined in a previous Delphi survey of clinicians) as well as the prevalence of fibrotic multimorbidity (the proportion of people with multiple fibrotic conditions). Methods: We included a random sample of 993,370 UK adults, alive, and enrolled at a UK general practice, providing data to the CPRD Aurum database as of 1st of January 2015. Individuals had to be eligible for linkage to hospital episode statistics (HES) and ONS death registration. We calculated the point prevalence of fibrotic conditions and multi-morbid fibrosis on the 1st of January 2015. Using death records of those who died in 2015, we investigated the prevalence of fibrosis associated death. We explored the most commonly co-occurring fibrotic conditions and determined the settings in which diagnoses were commonly made (primary care, secondary care or after death). Results: The point prevalence of any fibrotic condition was 21.46%. In total, 6.00% of people had fibrotic multimorbidity. Of the people who died in 2015, 34.82% had a recording of a fibrotic condition listed on their death certificate. Conclusion: The key finding was that fibrotic multimorbidity affects approximately 1 in 16 people.

Indexed as

CPRDelectronic health recordsfibrosisfibrotic multimorbiditymultimorbidityONS

Identifiers

PMID38952572
PMCPMC11215821

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.