Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38952439›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in surgery2024

Lymph node dissection in lung cancer surgery: a comparison between robot-assisted vs. video-assisted thoracoscopic approach.

Patrick Deniz Hurley, Giulia Fabbri, Nabih Berjaoui, Akshay Jatin Patel, Savvas Lampridis, Tom Routledge, Andrea Bille

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Patrick Deniz HurleyDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Royal Papworth Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Giulia FabbriDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.
Nabih BerjaouiDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.
Akshay Jatin PatelDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.
Savvas LampridisDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.
Tom RoutledgeDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.
Andrea BilleDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: TNM staging is the most important prognosticator for non-small cell lung cancer ( Methods: We retrospectively compiled a database of 717 patients from July 31, 2015-July 7, 2022, who underwent either a wedge resection, segmentectomy or lobectomy. We analysed the database according to lymph node dissection. The database was divided into RATS ( Results: The mean number of lymph nodes harvested overall with RATS was 6.1 ± 1.5 nodes; with VATS approach, it was 5.53 ± 1.8 nodes. The mean number of N1 stations harvested was 2.66 ± 0.8 with RATS, 2.36 ± 0.9 with VATS. RATS approach showed statistically higher lymph node dissection rates compared to VATS ( Conclusions: We conclude that in RATS procedures, there is a higher rate of lymph node dissection compared to VATS procedures. Upstaging was mostly seen in N0-N2 disease, this was observed at a higher rate with VATS procedures.

Indexed as

lung cancerlymph node dissectionrobot-assisted surgerythoracotomyvideo-assisted surgery

Identifiers

PMID38952439
PMCPMC11215068

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.