Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38952401›Full record

ArticleMolecular imaging

Comparison of Tumor Non-specific and PD-L1 Specific Imaging by Near-Infrared Fluorescence/Cerenkov Luminescence Dual-Modality In-situ Imaging.

Linhan Zhang, Lianmeng Zhao, Xue Lin, Sheng Zhao, Wenbin Pan, Dandan Wang, Zhongqi Sun, Jinping Li, Zonghui Liang, Rongjun Zhang and 1 more

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular imaging. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Observational
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Linhan ZhangDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China.
Lianmeng ZhaoUltrasound Department, Heilongjiang Provincial Hospital, Harbin, China.
Xue LinDepartment of Radiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China.
Sheng ZhaoDepartment of Radiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China.
Wenbin PanDepartment of Radiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China.
Dandan WangDepartment of Radiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China.
Zhongqi SunDepartment of Radiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China.
Jinping LiDepartment of Radiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China.
Zonghui LiangDepartment of Radiology, Jing'an District Centre Hospital (Jing'an Branch of Huashan Hospital), Shanghai, China.
Rongjun ZhangJiangsu Institute of Nuclear Medicine, Wuxi, China.
Huijie JiangDepartment of Radiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China.ORCID 0000-0001-7321-5297

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Labeled antibodies are excellent imaging agents in oncology to non-invasively visualize cancer-related antigens expression levels. However, tumor tracer uptake (TTU) of specific antibodies in-vivo may be inferior to non-specific IgG in some cases. Objectives: To explore factors affecting labeled antibody visualization by PD-L1 specific and non-specific imaging of nude mouse tumors. Methods: TTU was observed in RKO model on Cerenkov luminescence (CL) and near-infrared fluorescence (NIRF) imaging of radionuclide Results: Labeled IgG concentrated more in tumors than Atezolizumab. NIRF/CL imaging in 24 to 168 h showed that TTU gradually decreased over time, which decreased more slowly on CL imaging compared to NIRF imaging. The distribution data in-vitro showed that TTU of Conclusion: Non-specific IgG may not be suitable as a control for Atezolizumab in comparing tumor PD-L1 expression in nude mice via labeled antibody optical imaging under certain circumstances.

Indexed as

B7-H1 AntigenMice, NudeAnimalsAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedCell Line, TumorFemaleHumansImmunoglobulin GIodine RadioisotopesLuminescenceMiceNeoplasmsOptical ImagingAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedatezolizumabB7-H1 AntigenImmunoglobulin GIodine Radioisotopescolorectal cancermolecular imagingprogrammed cell death 1 ligand 1

Identifiers

PMID38952401
PMCPMC11208884

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.