ArticleHeliyon2024
A reliable jumping-based classification methodology for environment sector.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Decision-makers have consistently developed a range of classification models, each possessing unique features within the domain of intelligent models. These endeavors are all directed toward achieving the highest levels of accuracy. In recent developments, two notable methodologies-reliable modeling and jumping modeling approaches-offer specific advantages in formulating cost functions and have been recognized for their role in enhancing classifier accuracy. Specifically, the jumping methodology is based on aligning the learning process with the discrete nature of the classification goal, while the reliable methodology integrates the reliability factor into the learning paradigm. However, their innovative combination, leveraging both accuracy and reliability factors in guiding learning processes, leads to the creation of a high-performing classifier. This addresses a research gap in tackling classification challenges, which remains the core focus of the present study. To evaluate the performance of the proposed reliable jumping-based intelligent classifier in environmental decision-making, we considered ten benchmark datasets spanning various application domains. The numerical results demonstrate that the proposed Reliable Jumping-based intelligent classifier consistently outperforms traditional intelligent classifiers across all studied cases. As a result, the proposed approach proves to be a viable and effective alternative to other intelligent methods in environmental applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.