Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38952284›Full record

ArticleTurkish journal of orthodontics2024

Assessment of Bone Thickness at the Infra Zygomatic Crest Region for Various Orthodontic Miniscrew Implant (OMSI) Insertion Angles: A Cone-Beam Computed Tomographic Study.

Jitendra Sharan, Atul Bajoria, Ashok Kumar Jena, Pallawi Sinha, Arunachalam Shivakumar, Vineet Kumar Kamal, Anand Marya

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Turkish journal of orthodontics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jitendra SharanAll India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhubaneswar, Department of Dentistry, Unit of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, Odisha, India.ORCID 0000-0002-9788-8901
Atul BajoriaKalinga Institute of Dental Sciences, Department of Oral Medicine and Radiology, Odisha, India.ORCID 0000-0001-9796-9640
Ashok Kumar JenaAll India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhubaneswar, Department of Dentistry, Unit of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, Odisha, India.ORCID 0000-0003-1416-6768
Pallawi SinhaHi-Tech Dental College and Hospital, Clinic of Prosthodontics, Odisha, India.ORCID 0000-0001-7316-715X
Arunachalam ShivakumarInternational Medical University School of Dentistry, Department of Children & Community Oral Health, Malaysia.ORCID 0000-0001-5300-5102
Vineet Kumar KamalIndian Council of Medical Research-National Institute of Epidemiology, Division of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Chennai, India.ORCID 0000-0002-7295-1644
Anand MaryaUniversity of Puthisastra Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, Phnom Penh, Cambodia.ORCID 0000-0003-2009-4393

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the infrazygomatic crest (IZC) bone and develop guidelines for the optimum placement of orthodontic miniscrew implants (OMSIs) along the distobuccal root of the permanent maxillary first molar. Methods: Bone thickness of the IZC region of 50 young adults (25 males and 25 females) aged 18-30 years were evaluated using cone-beam computed tomography images. The infrazygomatic bone thickness along the distobuccal root of the permanent maxillary first molar was assessed at various insertion angles (40° to 75° i.r.t the maxillary occlusal plane) with an increment of 5°. Student's t-test was used to compare the IZC bone thickness and height at the orthodontic miniscrew insertion site for males and females on the right and left sides. Results: The bone thickness of the IZC region above the distobuccal root of the permanent maxillary first molar was estimated between 4.39±0.25 mm and 9.03±0.45 mm for insertion angles from 40° to 75° to the maxillary occlusal plane. The corresponding OMSI insertion heights were 17.71±0.61 mm to 13.69±0.75 mm, respectively, above the maxillary occlusal plane. There were statistically significant gender and side-wise variations in bone thickness at the IZC area and insertion height. Conclusion: The safe position for OMSI placement at the IZC was 13.69-16 mm from the maxillary occlusal plane with an insertion angle between 55° and 75°. These parameters provide the optimum placement of OMSIs along the distobuccal root of the permanent maxillary first molar.

Indexed as

Bone thicknesscone-beam computed tomographyinfrazygomatic crestorthodontic miniscrew implant

Identifiers

PMID38952284
PMCPMC11589249

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.