Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38952257›Full record

ArticleTurkish journal of orthodontics2024

Investigation of Different Miniscrew Head Designs by Finite Element Analysis.

Samet Çıklaçandır, Gökçenur Gökçe Kara, Yalçın İşler

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Turkish journal of orthodontics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Samet Çıklaçandırİzmir Katip Çelebi University Faculty of Engineering and Architecture, Department of Biomedical Engineering, İzmir, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0003-2076-2400
Gökçenur Gökçe KaraMarmara University Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Orthodontics, İstanbul, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0003-2121-0552
Yalçın İşlerİzmir Katip Çelebi University Faculty of Engineering and Architecture, Department of Biomedical Engineering, İzmir, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0002-2150-4756

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To determine the optimum miniscrew head design in orthodontic treatments for primary stability and compare stress distribution on a representative bone structure. Methods: Miniscrews with cross heads, mushroom-shaped heads, button heads, bracket heads, and through-hole heads were compared using finite element analysis. Miniscrews, whose three-dimensional drawings were completed using the SolidWorks computer-aided software package, were inserted in the bone block. Orthodontic force was applied to the head, and stress distributions, strains, and total deformations were investigated. Results: The lowest von Mises stress of 5.67 MPa was obtained using the bracket head. On the other hand, the highest von Mises stress of 22.4 MPa was found with the button head. Through mesh convergence analysis, the most appropriate mesh size was determined to be 0.5 mm; approximately 230,000 elements were formed for each model. Conclusion: Because the need for low stress is substantial for the primary stability of the miniscrew, this study demonstrated that the bracket head miniscrew is the optimal head design. In addition, it is posited that the success rate of orthodontic anchorage treatments will increase when bracket head miniscrews are used.

Indexed as

finite element analysisMiniscreworthodontic treatmenttemporary anchorage

Identifiers

PMID38952257
PMCPMC11589244

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.