ArticleTurkish journal of orthodontics2024
Relationship Between Circummaxillary and Intramaxillary Suture Densities and Skeletal Effects of Rapid Maxillary Expansion.
Article in Turkish journal of orthodontics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Relationship between the efficacy of micro-implant-assisted rapid maxillary arch expansion and maturation of the midpalatal sutures.Acta odontologica Scandinavica · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This retrospective clinical study aimed to evaluate the maturation of intramaxillary and circummaxillary suture systems and cervical vertebral maturation as predictors of the skeletal response achieved by rapid maxillary expansion (RME). Methods: A Digital Imaging and Communication in Medicine dataset of 20 patients (mean age: 15.55 years) prior (T0) and after (T1: 3.5±0.5 months) to RME were retrieved from the archive and analyzed. Bone density values of midpalatal suture (MPS), zygomaticomaxillary suture (ZMS), zygomaticotemporal suture (ZTS), pterygopalatine suture (PPS), and transverse palatine suture (TPS) were measured. The cervical vertebral maturational stages (CVS) were examined. The linear distances between the most lateral points of the piriform apertures were measured as the anterior reference, and the medial margins of the greater palatine foramina on the axial slice were chosen as the posterior reference. The difference at T1-T0 was calculated as the skeletal response to RME at anterior and posterior skeletal references. Spearman's rho rank and Kruskal-Wallis tests were used. Results: Mean density values of ZMS, PPS, ZTS, TPS, MPS-Anterior, and MPS-Posterior were 922.81, 807.44, 753.83, 640.77, 661.13, and 604.59 HU, respectively. Mean linear changes in anterior and posterior skeletal expansion were 2.93±1.78 and 1.93±2.52 mm. There was no significant relationship between maturation indicators and skeletal response. Significant relationships were found between CVS and MPS density and CVS and circummaxillary suture average density (p≤0.05). Conclusion: Sutural density showed significant variations among CVSs. Although there was no correlation between skeletal response and density measurements, sutural density was found to be a promising indicator for future studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.