Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38952050›Full record

ArticleOrthopaedic surgery2024

Fully Automatic Deep Learning Model for Spine Refracture in Patients with OVCF: A Multi-Center Study.

Xuetao Zhu, Dejian Liu, Lian Liu, Jingxuan Guo, Zedi Li, Yixiang Zhao, Tianhao Wu, Kaiwen Liu, Xinyu Liu, Xin Pan and 4 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Orthopaedic surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Xuetao Zhu *Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Cheeloo College of Medicine of Shandong University, Jinan, P. R. China.
Dejian Liu *Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Cheeloo College of Medicine of Shandong University, Jinan, P. R. China.
Lian Liu *Department of Emergency Surgery, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Cheeloo College of Medicine of Shandong University, Jinan, P. R. China.
Jingxuan GuoDepartment of anesthesiology, Affiliated Hospital of Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Jinan, China.
Zedi LiDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Cheeloo College of Medicine of Shandong University, Jinan, P. R. China.
Yixiang ZhaoDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Yantaishan Hospital, Yantai, China.
Tianhao WuDepartment of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, Graduate School of Dalian Medical University, Dalian, China.
Kaiwen LiuDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Cheeloo College of Medicine of Shandong University, Jinan, P. R. China.
Xinyu LiuDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Cheeloo College of Medicine of Shandong University, Jinan, P. R. China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4347-1633
Xin PanDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Cheeloo College of Medicine of Shandong University, Jinan, P. R. China.
Lei QiDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Cheeloo College of Medicine of Shandong University, Jinan, P. R. China.
Yuanqiang ZhangDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Cheeloo College of Medicine of Shandong University, Jinan, P. R. China.
Lei ChengDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Cheeloo College of Medicine of Shandong University, Jinan, P. R. China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5948-1342
Bin ChenDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Cheeloo College of Medicine of Shandong University, Jinan, P. R. China.

Funding

Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province ZR2022QE275
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe reaserch of artificial intelligence (AI) model for predicting spinal refracture is limited to bone mineral density, X-ray and some conventional laboratory indicators, which has its own limitations. Besides, it lacks specific indicators related to osteoporosis and imaging factors that can better reflect bone quality, such as computed tomography (CT).

objectiveTo construct a novel predicting model based on bone turn-over markers and CT to identify patients who were more inclined to suffer spine refracture.

methodsCT images and clinical information of 383 patients (training set = 240 cases of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCF), validation set = 63, test set = 80) were retrospectively collected from January 2015 to October 2022 at three medical centers. The U-net model was adopted to automatically segment ROI. Three-dimensional (3D) cropping of all spine regions was used to achieve the final ROI regions including 3D_Full and 3D_RoiOnly. We used the Densenet 121-3D model to model the cropped region and simultaneously build a T-NIPT prediction model. Diagnostics of deep learning models were assessed by constructing ROC curves. We generated calibration curves to assess the calibration performance. Additionally, decision curve analysis (DCA) was used to assess the clinical utility of the predictive models.

resultsThe performance of the test model is comparable to its performance on the training set (dice coefficients of 0.798, an mIOU of 0.755, an SA of 0.767, and an OS of 0.017). Univariable and multivariable analysis indicate that T_P1NT was an independent risk factor for refracture. The performance of predicting refractures in different ROI regions showed that 3D_Full model exhibits the highest calibration performance, with a Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit (HL) test statistic exceeding 0.05. The analysis of the training and test sets showed that the 3D_Full model, which integrates clinical and deep learning results, demonstrated superior performance with significant improvement (p-value < 0.05) compared to using clinical features independently or using only 3D_RoiOnly.

conclusionT_P1NT was an independent risk factor of refracture. Our 3D-FULL model showed better performance in predicting high-risk population of spine refracture than other models and junior doctors do. This model can be applicable to real-world translation due to its automatic segmentation and detection.

Indexed as

Deep LearningFractures, CompressionOsteoporotic FracturesSpinal FracturesTomography, X-Ray ComputedAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansImaging, Three-DimensionalMaleMiddle AgedRecurrenceRetrospective StudiesAutomatic SegmentationDeep LearningOsteoporotic Vertebral Compression FracturesPredictive ModelingRefracture

Identifiers

PMID38952050
PMCPMC11293932

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.