Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38951935›Full record

ArticleMicrobiome2024

Microbial signatures and continuum in endometrial cancer and benign patients.

Anita Semertzidou, Eilbhe Whelan, Ann Smith, Sherrianne Ng, Lauren Roberts, Jan J Brosens, Julian R Marchesi, Phillip R Bennett, David A MacIntyre, Maria Kyrgiou

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Microbiome, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Microbial medicines: Unlocking the therapeutic potential of the microbiome in cancer treatment.Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society · 2026
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Anita SemertzidouInstitute of Reproductive and Developmental Biology, Department of Digestion, Metabolism and Reproduction, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College Faculty of Medicine, Room 3006, 3rd Floor, Du Cane Road, London, W12 0NN, UK.
Eilbhe WhelanInstitute of Reproductive and Developmental Biology, Department of Digestion, Metabolism and Reproduction, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College Faculty of Medicine, Room 3006, 3rd Floor, Du Cane Road, London, W12 0NN, UK.
Ann SmithFaculty of Health and Applied Sciences, University West of England, Glenside Campus, Bristol, BS16 1DD, UK.
Sherrianne NgInstitute of Reproductive and Developmental Biology, Department of Digestion, Metabolism and Reproduction, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College Faculty of Medicine, Room 3006, 3rd Floor, Du Cane Road, London, W12 0NN, UK.
Lauren RobertsInstitute of Reproductive and Developmental Biology, Department of Digestion, Metabolism and Reproduction, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College Faculty of Medicine, Room 3006, 3rd Floor, Du Cane Road, London, W12 0NN, UK.
Jan J BrosensDivision of Reproductive Health, Warwick Medical School, Clinical Sciences Research Laboratories, University Hospital, Coventry, CV2 2DX, UK.
Julian R MarchesiDivision of Digestive Diseases, Department of Digestion, Metabolism and Reproduction, Imperial College London, London, W2 1NY, UK.
Phillip R BennettInstitute of Reproductive and Developmental Biology, Department of Digestion, Metabolism and Reproduction, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College Faculty of Medicine, Room 3006, 3rd Floor, Du Cane Road, London, W12 0NN, UK.
David A MacIntyreInstitute of Reproductive and Developmental Biology, Department of Digestion, Metabolism and Reproduction, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College Faculty of Medicine, Room 3006, 3rd Floor, Du Cane Road, London, W12 0NN, UK.
Maria KyrgiouInstitute of Reproductive and Developmental Biology, Department of Digestion, Metabolism and Reproduction, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College Faculty of Medicine, Room 3006, 3rd Floor, Du Cane Road, London, W12 0NN, UK. m.kyrgiou@imperial.ac.uk.

Funding

British Society of Colposcopy Cervical Pathology Jordan/Singer Award P47773Genesis Research Trust P55549Imperial College Healthcare Charity P47907
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEndometrial cancer is a multifactorial disease with inflammatory, metabolic and potentially microbial cues involved in disease pathogenesis. The endometrial cancer microbiome has been poorly characterised so far and studies have often overestimated bacterial biomass due to lack of integration of appropriate contamination controls. There is also a scarcity of evidence on the functionality of microbial microenvironments in endometrial cancer. This work addresses that knowledge gap by interrogating the genuine, contamination-free microbial signatures in the female genital tract and rectum of women with endometrial cancer and the mechanistic role of microbiome on carcinogenic processes.

resultsHere we sampled different regions of the reproductive tract (vagina, cervix, endometrium, fallopian tubes and ovaries) and rectum of 61 patients (37 endometrial cancer; 24 benign controls). We performed 16S rRNA gene sequencing of the V1-V2 hypervariable regions and qPCR of the 16S rRNA gene to qualitatively and quantitatively assess microbial communities and used 3D benign and endometrial cancer organoids to evaluate the effect of microbial products of L. crispatus, which was found depleted in endometrial cancer patients following primary analysis, on endometrial cell proliferation and inflammation. We found that the upper genital tract of a subset of women with and without endometrial cancer harbour microbiota quantitatively and compositionally distinguishable from background contaminants. Endometrial cancer was associated with reduced cervicovaginal and rectal bacterial load together with depletion of Lactobacillus species relative abundance, including L. crispatus, increased bacterial diversity and enrichment of Porphyromonas, Prevotella, Peptoniphilus and Anaerococcus in the lower genital tract and endometrium. Treatment of benign and malignant endometrial organoids with L. crispatus conditioned media exerted an anti-proliferative effect at high concentrations but had minimal impact on cytokine and chemokine profiles.

conclusionsOur findings provide evidence that the upper female reproductive tract of some women contains detectable levels of bacteria, the composition of which is associated with endometrial cancer. Whether this is a cause or consequence of cancer pathophysiology and what is the functional significance of this finding remain to be elucidated to guide future screening tools and microbiome-based therapeutics. Video Abstract.

Indexed as

BacteriaEndometrial NeoplasmsMicrobiotaRNA, Ribosomal, 16SAdultAgedEndometriumFemaleHumansMiddle AgedRectumVaginaRNA, Ribosomal, 16SEndometrial cancerFemale genital tractMicrobiome

Identifiers

PMID38951935
PMCPMC11218081

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.