Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38951878›Full record

ReviewResearch involvement and engagement2024

Developing inclusive public involvement and engagement activities with secondary school students and educational professionals: a protocol.

Lauren Cross, Dale Banham, G J Melendez-Torres, Tamsin Ford, Esther van Sluijs, Kristin Liabo

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Research involvement and engagement, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Lauren CrossUniversity of Cambridge (MRC Epidemiology Unit), Cambridge, UK. lauren.cross@mrc-epid.cam.ac.uk.
Dale BanhamNorthgate High School, Ipswich, UK.
G J Melendez-TorresUniversity of Exeter (Medical School), Exeter, UK.
Tamsin FordDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Esther van SluijsUniversity of Cambridge (MRC Epidemiology Unit), Cambridge, UK.
Kristin LiaboUniversity of Exeter (Medical School), Exeter, UK.

Funding

School for Public Health Research NIHR204000
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPublic involvement and engagement (PI&E) is increasingly recognised as an important component of research. It can offer valuable insights from those with experiential knowledge to improve research quality, relevance, and reach. Similarly, schools are ever more common sites for health research and, more recently, PI&E. However, 'gold-standard' practice is yet to be established, and activities/approaches remain underreported. As a result, knowledge can remain localised or lost. Diversity and inclusion also remains a challenge.

methodsThis protocol has been informed by UK national guidance, evidence-based frameworks and available implementation literature. It describes both rationale and approach to conducting PI&E activities within a secondary school context. Activities are designed to be engaging, safe and accessible to young people with diverse experiences, with scope to be iteratively developed in line with public collaborator preference. DISCUSSION: Young people should be architects of their involvement and engagement. Ongoing appraisal and transparency of approaches to PI&E in school settings is crucial. Expected challenges of implementing this protocol include facilitating a safe space for the discussion of sensitive topics, absence and attrition, recruiting students with a diverse range of experiences, and potential knowledge and capacity barriers of both facilitator and contributors. Activities to mitigate these risks are suggested and explored.

Indexed as

Diversity and inclusionDoctoral researchProtocolPublic involvement and engagementSecondary schoolsYoung people

Identifiers

PMID38951878
PMCPMC11218269

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.