Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38951853›Full record

ArticleJournal of experimental & clinical cancer research : CR2024

Monitoring changing patterns in HER2 addiction by liquid biopsy in advanced breast cancer patients.

Elena Giordani, Matteo Allegretti, Alberto Sinibaldi, Francesco Michelotti, Gianluigi Ferretti, Elena Ricciardi, Giovanna Ziccheddu, Fabio Valenti, Simona Di Martino, Cristiana Ercolani and 10 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of experimental & clinical cancer research : CR, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05735392 (Liquid Biopsy), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05735392 nacompletednot on this map

Liquid Biopsy: Intercepting Mutational Trajectories of HER2 Breast Cancer Inpatients Under T-DM1 Treatment

TypeinterventionalSponsorConsorzio OncotechRan2018 to 2022Enrolled48ConditionsMetastatic Breast CancerArmsBoth blood and tissues collection for patients with metastatic breast cancer HER2+ pretreated with no more than one line of anti-HER2 therapy for advanced breast cancer.
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors.

Elena GiordaniTranslational Oncology Research, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy.
Matteo AllegrettiTranslational Oncology Research, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy.
Alberto SinibaldiDepartment of Basic and Applied Sciences for Engineering, SAPIENZA University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Francesco MichelottiDepartment of Basic and Applied Sciences for Engineering, SAPIENZA University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Gianluigi FerrettiDivision of Medical Oncology 1, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy.
Elena RicciardiTranslational Oncology Research, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy.
Giovanna ZicchedduTranslational Oncology Research, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy.
Fabio ValentiTranslational Oncology Research, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy.
Simona Di MartinoUOC Anatomy Pathology and Biobank, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Istituti Fisioterapici Ospitalieri, Rome, Italy.
Cristiana ErcolaniPathology Unit, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy.
Diana GiannarelliFacility of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Grazia ArpinoOncology Division, Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, University Federico II, Naples, Italy.
Stefania GoriMedical Oncology, IRCCS-Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Negrar di Valpolicella, Verona, Italy.
Claudia OmariniDivision of Medical Oncology, Department of Oncology and Hematology, University Hospital of Modena, Modena, Italy.
Alberto ZambelliOncology Unit, ASST Papa Giovanni XXIII, Bergamo, Italy.
Emilio BriaMedical Oncology, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy.
Ida ParisDepartment of Woman and Child Health, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Simonetta BuglioniPathology Unit, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy.
Patrizio GiacominiPrecision Medicine Unit in Senology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Largo Agostino Gemelli, 8, 00168, Roma, Italy. patrizio.giacomini@guest.policlinicogemelli.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6109-1709
Alessandra FabiPrecision Medicine Unit in Senology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Largo Agostino Gemelli, 8, 00168, Roma, Italy.

Funding

Lazio Innova A0375-2020-36630
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDuring targeted treatment, HER2-positive breast cancers invariably lose HER2 DNA amplification. In contrast, and interestingly, HER2 proteins may be either lost or gained. To longitudinally and systematically appreciate complex/discordant changes in HER2 DNA/protein stoichiometry, HER2 DNA copy numbers and soluble blood proteins (aHER2/sHER2) were tested in parallel, non-invasively (by liquid biopsy), and in two-dimensions, hence HER2-2D.

methodsaHER2 and sHER2 were assessed by digital PCR and ELISA before and after standard-of-care treatment of advanced HER2-positive breast cancer patients (n=37) with the antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) Trastuzumab-emtansine (T-DM1).

resultsAs expected, aHER2 was invariably suppressed by T-DM1, but this loss was surprisingly mirrored by sHER2 gain, sometimes of considerable entity, in most (30/37; 81%) patients. This unorthodox split in HER2 oncogenic dosage was supported by reciprocal aHER2/sHER2 kinetics in two representative cases, and an immunohistochemistry-high status despite copy-number-neutrality in 4/5 available post-T-DM1 tumor re-biopsies from sHER2-gain patients. Moreover, sHER2 was preferentially released by dying breast cancer cell lines treated in vitro by T-DM1. Finally, sHER2 gain was associated with a longer PFS than sHER2 loss (mean PFS 282 vs 133 days, 95% CI [210-354] vs [56-209], log-rank test p=0.047), particularly when cases (n=11) developing circulating HER2-bypass alterations during T-DM1 treatment were excluded (mean PFS 349 vs 139 days, 95% CI [255-444] vs [45-232], log-rank test p=0.009).

conclusionsHER2 gain is adaptively selected in tumor tissues and recapitulated in blood by sHER2 gain. Possibly, an increased oncogenic dosage is beneficial to the tumor during anti-HER2 treatment with naked antibodies, but favorable to the host during treatment with a strongly cytotoxic ADC such as T-DM1. In the latter case, HER2-gain tumors may be kept transiently in check until alternative oncogenic drivers, revealed by liquid biopsy, bypass HER2. Whichever the interpretation, HER2-2D might help to tailor/prioritize anti-HER2 treatments, particularly ADCs active on aHER2-low/sHER2-low tumors.

trial registrationNCT05735392 retrospectively registered on January 31, 2023 https://www. CLINICALTRIALS: gov/search?term=NCT05735392.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesAdo-Trastuzumab EmtansineAdultAgedBiomarkers, TumorFemaleHumansLiquid BiopsyMiddle AgedTrastuzumabAdo-Trastuzumab EmtansineBiomarkers, TumorERBB2 protein, humanErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesTrastuzumabCirculating cell-free DNA (cfDNA)Circulating soluble HER2 (sHER2)HER2-positive breast cancerLiquid biopsyTrastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1)

Identifiers

PMID38951853
PMCPMC11218356

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.