Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38951766›Full record

ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2024

Does the implementation of revised American College of Cardiology and American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) guidelines improve the identification of stillbirths and preterm births in hypertensive pregnancies: a population-based cohort study from South Asia and sub-Saharan Africa.

Muhammad Imran Nisar, Ibrahim Kabole, Rasheda Khanam, Shahira Shahid, Bihila Abdalla Bakari, Nabidul Haque Chowdhury, Muhammad Farrukh Qazi, Arup Dutta, Sayedur Rahman, Javairia Khalid and 17 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

27 authors.

Muhammad Imran Nisar *Department of Pediatrics and Child Health, Aga Khan University, Stadium Road, Karachi, 74800, Karachi, Pakistan.
Ibrahim Kabole *Center for Public Health Kinetics, New Delhi, India.
Rasheda Khanam *Department of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Shahira Shahid *Department of Pediatrics and Child Health, Aga Khan University, Stadium Road, Karachi, 74800, Karachi, Pakistan.
Bihila Abdalla Bakari *Center for Public Health Kinetics, New Delhi, India.
Nabidul Haque Chowdhury *Projahnmo Research Foundation, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Muhammad Farrukh Qazi *Department of Pediatrics and Child Health, Aga Khan University, Stadium Road, Karachi, 74800, Karachi, Pakistan.
Arup Dutta *Center for Public Health Kinetics, New Delhi, India.
Sayedur Rahman *Department of Women's and Children's Health, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Javairia KhalidDepartment of Pediatrics and Child Health, Aga Khan University, Stadium Road, Karachi, 74800, Karachi, Pakistan.
Usha DhingraCenter for Public Health Kinetics, New Delhi, India.
Tarik HasanProjahnmo Research Foundation, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Nadia AnsariDepartment of Pediatrics and Child Health, Aga Khan University, Stadium Road, Karachi, 74800, Karachi, Pakistan.
Saikat DebCenter for Public Health Kinetics, New Delhi, India.
Dipak K MitraDepartment of Public Health, School of Health and Life Sciences, North South University, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Usma MehmoodDepartment of Pediatrics and Child Health, Aga Khan University, Stadium Road, Karachi, 74800, Karachi, Pakistan.
Fahad AftabCenter for Public Health Kinetics, New Delhi, India.
Salahuddin AhmedProjahnmo Research Foundation, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Shahiryar KhanDepartment of Pediatrics and Child Health, Aga Khan University, Stadium Road, Karachi, 74800, Karachi, Pakistan.
Said Mohammad AliPublic Health Laboratory-IDC, Pemba, Tanzania.
Saifuddin AhmedDepartment of Population, Family and Reproductive Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Alexander ManuLondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, Faculty of Epidemiology and Public Health, London, UK.
Sachiyo YoshidaDepartment for Maternal, Child, Adolescents and Ageing Health, World Health Organization, Avenue Appia 20, Geneva, 1211, Switzerland. yoshidas@who.int.
Rajiv BahlDepartment for Maternal, Child, Adolescents and Ageing Health, World Health Organization, Avenue Appia 20, Geneva, 1211, Switzerland.
Abdullah H Baqui *Department of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Sunil Sazawal *Center for Public Health Kinetics, New Delhi, India.
Fyezah Jehan *Department of Pediatrics and Child Health, Aga Khan University, Stadium Road, Karachi, 74800, Karachi, Pakistan. fyezah.jehan@aku.edu.

Funding

Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation I64438World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDP) are a significant cause of maternal mortality worldwide. The classification and treatment of hypertension in pregnancy remain debated. We aim to compare the effectiveness of the revised 2017 ACC/AHA blood pressure threshold in predicting adverse pregnancy outcomes.

methodsWe conducted a secondary data analysis of the Alliance for Maternal and Newborn Health Improvement (AMANHI) biorepository study, including 10,001 pregnant women from Bangladesh, Pakistan, and Tanzania. Blood pressure was measured using validated devices at different antenatal care visits. The blood pressure readings were categorized as: normal blood pressure (systolic blood pressure (sBP) < 120 mm Hg and diastolic blood pressure (dBP) < 80 mm Hg), elevated blood pressure (sBP 120-129 and dBP < 80), stage 1 hypertension (sBP 130-139 or dBP 80-89, or both), and stage 2 hypertension (sBP ≥ 140 or dBP ≥ 90, or both). We estimated risk ratios for stillbirths and preterm births, as well as diagnostic test properties of both the pre-existing JNC7 (≥ 140/90) and revised ACC/AHA (≥ 130/80) thresholds using normal blood pressure as reference group.

resultsFrom May 2014 to June 2018, blood pressure readings were available for 9,448 women (2,894 in Bangladesh, 2,303 in Pakistan, and 4,251 in Tanzania). We observed normal blood pressure in 70%, elevated blood pressure in 12.4%, stage 1 hypertension in 15.2%, and stage 2 hypertension in 2.5% of the pregnant women respectively. Out of these, 310 stillbirths and 9,109 live births were recorded, with 887 preterm births. Using the ACC/AHA criteria, the stage 1 hypertension cut-off revealed 15.3% additional hypertension diagnoses as compared to JNC7 criteria. ACC/AHA defined hypertension was significantly associated with stillbirths (RR 1.8, 95% CI 1.4, 2.3). The JNC 7 hypertension cut-off of ≥ 140/90 was significantly associated with a higher risk of preterm births (RR 1.6, 95% CI 1.2, 2.2) and stillbirths (RR 3.6, 95% CI 2.5, 5.3). Both criteria demonstrated low sensitivities (8.4 for JNC-7 and 28.1 for ACC/AHA) and positive predictive values (11.0 for JNC7 and 5.2 for ACC/AHA) in predicting adverse outcomes.

conclusionThe ACC/AHA criteria (≥ 130/80) identified additional cases of hypertension but had limited predictive accuracy for stillbirths and preterm births, highlighting the ongoing need for improved criteria in managing pregnancy-related hypertension.

Indexed as

Hypertension, Pregnancy-InducedPractice Guidelines as TopicPremature BirthStillbirthAdultAmerican Heart AssociationAsia, SouthernBangladeshBlood PressureCohort StudiesFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornPakistanPregnancyTanzaniaAdverse outcomesBangladeshHypertensionPakistanPregnancyTanzania

Identifiers

PMID38951766
PMCPMC11218258

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.