Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38951760›Full record

ArticleBMC cancer2024

Exploring long-term cancer survivors' care experiences and unmet needs: protocol for a qualitative study.

Christian Speckemeier, K Maus, A Bialobrzeski, B Jaspers, L Radbruch, S Hahn, J Wasem, V Grünwald, U Dirksen, A Neumann

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC cancer, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Machine Learning Models for Predicting Pain, Fatigue, Depression, Anxiety, and Malnutrition in Cancer Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of nursing scholarship : an official publication of Sigma Theta Tau International Honor Society of Nursing · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Life beyond remission: physical, emotional, and social reintegration of cancer survivors in Tunisia-a cross-sectional study.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Christian SpeckemeierInstitute for Healthcare Management and Research, University of Duisburg-Essen, 45127, Thea-Leymann-Str. 9, Essen, Germany. christian.speckemeier@medman.uni-due.de.
K MausDepartment of Palliative Medicine, University Hospital Bonn, 53127, Venusberg-Campus 1, Bonn, Germany.
A BialobrzeskiDepartment of Palliative Medicine, University Hospital Bonn, 53127, Venusberg-Campus 1, Bonn, Germany.
B JaspersDepartment of Palliative Medicine, University Hospital Bonn, 53127, Venusberg-Campus 1, Bonn, Germany.
L RadbruchDepartment of Palliative Medicine, University Hospital Bonn, 53127, Venusberg-Campus 1, Bonn, Germany.
S HahnDepartment of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, University Hospital Bonn, 53127, Venusberg-Campus 1, Bonn, Germany.
J WasemInstitute for Healthcare Management and Research, University of Duisburg-Essen, 45127, Thea-Leymann-Str. 9, Essen, Germany.
V GrünwaldClinic for Urology, Clinic for Medical Oncology, University Hospital Essen, 45147, Hufelandstr. 55, Essen, Germany.
U DirksenPaediatrics III, German Cancer Research Centre (DKTK), West German Cancer Center, National Center for Tumordiseases (NCT) site Essen, University Hospital Essen, 45147, Hufelandstraße 55, Essen, Germany.
A NeumannInstitute for Healthcare Management and Research, University of Duisburg-Essen, 45127, Thea-Leymann-Str. 9, Essen, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe number of cancer survivors has increased in recent decades, and the majority of them suffer from sequelae of their disease and treatment. This study, which is part of the larger research project OPTILATER, aims to explore different aspects of care services for long-term survivors (≥ 5 years after initial cancer diagnosis) in Germany. The study places an emphasis on the situation of people from different age groups, with different socio-demographic and cultural backgrounds, and sexually and gender diverse individuals.

methodsTo investigate experiences related to follow-up care, focus groups (n = 2) will be conducted with members of patient advisory councils and advocacy groups, representatives of communities, healthcare workers and networks, as well as members of Associations of Statutory Health Insurance Physicians. Guided interviews will be carried out with patients and relatives (n = 40) to investigate needs, barriers and obstacles in terms of follow-up care. On this basis, additional focus groups (n = 2) will be carried out to derive possible scenarios for improving the consideration of needs. Focus groups and interviews will follow a semi-structured format and will be analysed content-analytically. Focus groups and interviews will be conducted online, recorded, transcribed, and analysed independently by two persons. DISCUSSION: The qualitative approach is considered suitable because of the exploratory research aims. The identification of experiences and barriers can reveal disparities and optimization potential in the care of long-term cancer survivors.

Indexed as

Cancer SurvivorsFocus GroupsNeoplasmsQualitative ResearchAdultAgedFemaleGermanyHealth Services Needs and DemandHumansMaleMiddle AgedCancer survivorshipFocus groupInterviewLGBTLong-termMinority

Identifiers

PMID38951760
PMCPMC11218380

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.