ArticleEye (London, England)2024
Primary care optometry-based diabetic retinopathy review clinics - a new model of care and comparison with virtual diabetic retinopathy clinics.
Article in Eye (London, England), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundGiven the increasing prevalence of diabetes and diabetic retinopathy (DR) in the UK, this study evaluates a novel primary care optometry-based DR review service against traditional hospital-based virtual DR clinics.
methodsIn the hospital-based virtual DR service, patients attended for data capture (visual acuity, fundus photography, macular OCT scanning) with asynchronous review at a later data by a hospital clinician. In the primary care optometry DR review clinic, patients attended an optometry practice for a face-to-face(F2F) review (with imaging) by an optometrist with additional training in DR. Data from both clinic types were analysed. Metrics included DR grading, management plans, grading concordance between primary care optometrists and consultant ophthalmologists, and the assessment of "ungradable" retinopathy referrals.
resultsOne thousand seven hundred and sixty patients attended the virtual clinic between January 2021 and September 2023. 954 patients attended the primary care review clinic between August 2022 and September 2023. Grading agreements between primary care optometrists and hospital consultants on those patients referred for consultant opinion were significant with Weighted Kappa scores of 0.61(95% CI 0.52-0.69) for DR grade and 0.69(95% CI 0.56-0.82) for diabetic macular oedema (DMO) status. Additionally, the primary care optometry clinic reported a considerably reduced non-attendance rate of 5%, in contrast to 21% in virtual clinics.
conclusionThe primary care optometry-based DR service emerges as an efficient, safe alternative to hospital services. It offers notable advantages over virtual clinics and addresses a care gap for those unsuitable for virtual consultations. The results highlight the potential of primary care-based models in managing DR.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.