ArticleNPJ precision oncology2024
Combination of MRI-based prediction and CRISPR/Cas12a-based detection for IDH genotyping in glioma.
Article in NPJ precision oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Diagnostic performance of deep learning for predicting glioma isocitrate dehydrogenase and 1p/19q co-deletion in MRI: a systematic review and meta-analysis.European radiology · 2026Pooled it
- IDH Mutation Assessment in Gliomas from Anatomical MRI Using Deep Learning: A Comparative Analysis of Centralized and Federated Learning Frameworks.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- An immune-related miRNA signature predicts the prognosis in nasopharyngeal carcinoma.Translational cancer research · 2025Article
- Leveraging pathological markers of lower grade glioma to predict the occurrence of secondary epilepsy, a retrospective study.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Rapid Genotyping ofBiomolecules · 2025Article
- Customized SAM-Med3D with multi-view adapter and T2-FLAIR mismatch features for glioma IDH genotyping and grading.Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience · 2025Article
- Predicting isocitrate dehydrogenase status in glioma using hierarchical attention-based deep 3D multiple instance learning.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Early identification of IDH mutation status is of great significance in clinical therapeutic decision-making in the treatment of glioma. We demonstrate a technological solution to improve the accuracy and reliability of IDH mutation detection by combining MRI-based prediction and a CRISPR-based automatic integrated gene detection system (AIGS). A model was constructed to predict the IDH mutation status using whole slices in MRI scans with a Transformer neural network, and the predictive model achieved accuracies of 0.93, 0.87, and 0.84 using the internal and two external test sets, respectively. Additionally, CRISPR/Cas12a-based AIGS was constructed, and AIGS achieved 100% diagnostic accuracy in terms of IDH detection using both frozen tissue and FFPE samples in one hour. Moreover, the feature attribution of our predictive model was assessed using GradCAM, and the highest correlations with tumor cell percentages in enhancing and IDH-wildtype gliomas were found to have GradCAM importance (0.65 and 0.5, respectively). This MRI-based predictive model could, therefore, guide biopsy for tumor-enriched, which would ensure the veracity and stability of the rapid detection results. The combination of our predictive model and AIGS improved the early determination of IDH mutation status in glioma patients. This combined system of MRI-based prediction and CRISPR/Cas12a-based detection can be used to guide biopsy, resection, and radiation for glioma patients to improve patient outcomes.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.