Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38951562›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Complex artificial intelligence models for energy sustainability in educational buildings.

Rasikh Tariq, Awsan Mohammed, Adel Alshibani, Maria Soledad Ramírez-Montoya

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Rasikh TariqInstitute for the Future of Education, Tecnologico de Monterrey, Ave. Eugenio Garza Sada 2501, 64849, Monterrey, NL, Mexico. rasikhtariq@tec.mx.ORCID 0000-0002-3310-432X
Awsan MohammedArchitectural Engineering and Construction Management Department, King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals, 31261, Dhahran, Saudi Arabia. awsan.mohammed@kfupm.edu.sa.ORCID 0000-0001-6500-5994
Adel AlshibaniArchitectural Engineering and Construction Management Department, King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals, 31261, Dhahran, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0001-7809-106X
Maria Soledad Ramírez-MontoyaInstitute for the Future of Education, Tecnologico de Monterrey, Ave. Eugenio Garza Sada 2501, 64849, Monterrey, NL, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0002-1274-706X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Energy consumption of constructed educational facilities significantly impacts economic, social and environment sustainable development. It contributes to approximately 37% of the carbon dioxide emissions associated with energy use and procedures. This paper aims to introduce a study that investigates several artificial intelligence-based models to predict the energy consumption of the most important educational buildings; schools. These models include decision trees, K-nearest neighbors, gradient boosting, and long-term memory networks. The research also investigates the relationship between the input parameters and the yearly energy usage of educational buildings. It has been discovered that the school sizes and AC capacities are the most impact variable associated with higher energy consumption. While 'Type of School' is less direct or weaker correlation with 'Annual Consumption'. The four developed models were evaluated and compared in training and testing stages. The Decision Tree model demonstrates strong performance on the training data with an average prediction error of about 3.58%. The K-Nearest Neighbors model has significantly higher errors, with RMSE on training data as high as 38,429.4, which may be indicative of overfitting. In contrast, Gradient Boosting can almost perfectly predict the variations within the training dataset. The performance metrics suggest that some models manage this variability better than others, with Gradient Boosting and LSTM standing out in terms of their ability to handle diverse data ranges, from the minimum consumption of approximately 99,274.95 to the maximum of 683,191.8. This research underscores the importance of sustainable educational buildings not only as physical learning spaces but also as dynamic environments that contribute to informal educational processes. Sustainable buildings serve as real-world examples of environmental stewardship, teaching students about energy efficiency and sustainability through their design and operation. By incorporating advanced AI-driven tools to optimize energy consumption, educational facilities can become interactive learning hubs that encourage students to engage with concepts of sustainability in their everyday surroundings.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceSchoolsConservation of Energy ResourcesDecision TreesHumansModels, TheoreticalEducational buildingsEducational innovationEnergy consumptionHigher educationMachine learning

Identifiers

PMID38951562
PMCPMC11217432

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.