Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38951530›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Comparison of digital and analog [

Yong-Il Kim, Dong Yun Lee, Changhwan Sung, Sang Ju Lee, Seung Jun Oh, Jungsu S Oh, Shinkyo Yoon, Jae Lyun Lee, Bumjin Lim, Jungyo Suh and 7 more

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. PSMA PET/CT-Derived Indicators and Outcomes After [Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2026
    Article
  3. Time to shift to Digital PET/CT?Nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Yong-Il KimDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Dong Yun LeeDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Changhwan SungDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Sang Ju LeeDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Seung Jun OhDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Jungsu S OhDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Shinkyo YoonDepartment of Oncology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Jae Lyun LeeDepartment of Oncology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Bumjin LimDepartment of Urology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Jungyo SuhDepartment of Urology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Juhyun ParkDepartment of Urology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Dalsan YouDepartment of Urology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
In Gab JeongDepartment of Urology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Jun Hyuk HongDepartment of Urology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Hanjong AhnDepartment of Urology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Choung-Soo KimDepartment of Urology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Jin-Sook RyuDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea. jsryu2@amc.seoul.kr.

Funding

Ministry of Health and Welfare HR18C0016
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Digital positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) has shown enhanced sensitivity and spatial resolution compared with analog PET/CT. The present study compared the diagnostic performance of digital and analog PET/CT with [

Indexed as

Gallium IsotopesGallium RadioisotopesNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalPositron Emission Tomography Computed TomographyProstatectomyProstate-Specific AntigenProstatic NeoplasmsAgedEdetic AcidHumansMaleMiddle AgedOligopeptidesProspective StudiesEdetic Acidgallium 68 PSMA-11Gallium IsotopesGallium RadioisotopesOligopeptidesProstate-Specific AntigenPSMA-11Biochemical recurrenceDetection ratePositron emission tomographyProstate cancerProstate-specific membrane antigen

Identifiers

PMID38951530
PMCPMC11217435

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.