Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38951504›Full record

ArticleJournal of agricultural and food chemistry2024

Tongue-on-a-Chip: Parallel Recording of Sweet and Bitter Receptor Responses to Sequential Injections of Pure and Mixed Sweeteners.

Margriet Roelse, Nadejda Krasteva, Steve Pawlizak, Michaela K Mai, Maarten A Jongsma

Abstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of agricultural and food chemistry, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Chemosensory tobacco product toxicology part 2: toxicological testing, assays, and state of the science.Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Margriet RoelseBU Bioscience, Wageningen University and Research, Droevendaalsesteeg 1, 6708 PB Wageningen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0009-0001-6556-1867
Nadejda KrastevaStuttgart Laboratory 2, Sony Semiconductor Solutions Europe, Sony Europe B.V., Zweigniederlassung Deutschland, Hedelfinger Str. 61, 70327 Stuttgart, Germany.
Steve PawlizakStuttgart Laboratory 2, Sony Semiconductor Solutions Europe, Sony Europe B.V., Zweigniederlassung Deutschland, Hedelfinger Str. 61, 70327 Stuttgart, Germany.
Michaela K MaiStuttgart Laboratory 2, Sony Semiconductor Solutions Europe, Sony Europe B.V., Zweigniederlassung Deutschland, Hedelfinger Str. 61, 70327 Stuttgart, Germany.
Maarten A JongsmaBU Bioscience, Wageningen University and Research, Droevendaalsesteeg 1, 6708 PB Wageningen, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A microfluidic tongue-on-a-chip platform has been evaluated relative to the known sensory properties of various sweeteners. Analogous metrics of typical sensory features reported by human panels such as sweet taste thresholds, onset, and lingering, as well as bitter off-flavor and blocking interactions were deduced from the taste receptor activation curves and then compared. To this end, a flow cell containing a receptor cell array bearing the sweet and six bitter taste receptors was transiently exposed to pure and mixed sweetener samples. The sample concentration gradient across time was separately characterized by the injection of fluorescein dye. Subsequently, cellular calcium responses to different doses of advantame, aspartame, saccharine, and sucrose were overlaid with the concentration gradient. Parameters describing the response kinetics compared to the gradient were quantified. Advantame at 15 μM recorded a significantly faster sweetness onset of 5 ± 2 s and a longer lingering time of 39 s relative to sucrose at 100 mM with an onset of 13 ± 2 s and a lingering time of 6 s. Saccharine was shown to activate the bitter receptors TAS2R8, TAS2R31, and TAS2R43, confirming its known off-flavor, whereas addition of cyclamate reduced or blocked this saccharine bitter response. The potential of using this tongue-on-a-chip to bridge the gap with in vitro assays and taste panels is discussed.

Indexed as

Receptors, G-Protein-CoupledSweetening AgentsTasteAspartameHumansLab-On-A-Chip DevicesSaccharinSucroseTaste BudsTaste Receptors, Type 2TongueAspartameReceptors, G-Protein-CoupledSaccharinSucroseSweetening AgentsTaste Receptors, Type 2antagonismbitter blockingEC50GPCRlingeringmicrofluidicsoff-tasteonsettaste threshold

Identifiers

PMID38951504
PMCPMC11261611

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.