Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38951411›Full record

ArticleAnnals of surgical oncology2024

Circulating Exosomal MicroRNA Signature Predicts Peritoneal Metastasis in Patients with Advanced Gastric Cancer.

Yuma Wada, Masaaki Nishi, Kozo Yoshikawa, Chie Takasu, Takuya Tokunaga, Toshihiro Nakao, Hideya Kashihara, Toshiaki Yoshimoto, Mitsuo Shimada

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of surgical oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Yuma WadaDepartment of Surgery, Tokushima University, Tokushima, Japan.
Masaaki NishiDepartment of Surgery, Tokushima University, Tokushima, Japan. nishi.masaaki@tokushima-u.ac.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3845-457X
Kozo YoshikawaDepartment of Surgery, Tokushima University, Tokushima, Japan.
Chie TakasuDepartment of Surgery, Tokushima University, Tokushima, Japan.
Takuya TokunagaDepartment of Surgery, Tokushima University, Tokushima, Japan.
Toshihiro NakaoDepartment of Surgery, Tokushima University, Tokushima, Japan.
Hideya KashiharaDepartment of Surgery, Tokushima University, Tokushima, Japan.
Toshiaki YoshimotoDepartment of Surgery, Tokushima University, Tokushima, Japan.
Mitsuo ShimadaDepartment of Surgery, Tokushima University, Tokushima, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDespite a radical operation, about half of gastric cancer (GC) patients with advanced GC experience peritoneal metastasis (PM), and the patients with PM have a poor prognosis. However, because staging laparoscopy was a highly invasive procedure for patients, identification of PM using a liquid biopsy can be useful for patients with GC.

methodsThis study analyzed two genome-wide miRNA expression profiling datasets (GSE164174 and TCGA). The study prioritized biomarkers in pretreatment plasma specimens from clinical training and validation cohorts of patients with GC. The authors developed an integrated exosomal miRNA panel and established a risk-stratification model, which was combined with the miRNA panel and currently used tumor markers (CEA, CA19-9, CA125, and CA72-4 levels).

resultsThe comprehensive discovery effort identified a four-miRNA panel that robustly predicted the metastasis with excellent accuracy in the TCGA dataset (area under the curve [AUC] 0.86). A circulating exosomal miRNA panel was established successfully with remarkable diagnostic accuracy in the clinical training (AUC 0.85) and validation (AUC 0.86) cohorts. Moreover, the predictive accuracy of the panel was significantly superior to that of conventional clinical factors (P < 0.01), and the risk-stratification model was dramatically superior to the panel and currently used clinical factors for predicting PM (AUC 0.94; univariate: odds ratio [OR] 77.00 [P < 0.01]; multivariate OR 57.71 [P = 0.01]).

conclusionsThe novel risk-stratification model for predicting PM has potential for clinical translation as a liquid biopsy assay for patients with GC. The study findings highlight the potential clinical impact of the model for improved selection and management of patients with GC.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorExosomesPeritoneal NeoplasmsStomach NeoplasmsAgedCirculating MicroRNAFemaleFollow-Up StudiesGene Expression ProfilingHumansMaleMicroRNAsMiddle AgedPrognosisSurvival RateBiomarkers, TumorCirculating MicroRNAMicroRNAsComprehensive discoveryExosomal miRNAGastric cancerLiquid biopsyPeritoneal metastasis

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.