ArticleAnnals of surgical oncology2024
Circulating Exosomal MicroRNA Signature Predicts Peritoneal Metastasis in Patients with Advanced Gastric Cancer.
Article in Annals of surgical oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Analysis of the role of BAP31-related exosomal miRNAs as potential prognostic biomarkers for gastric cancer.Functional & integrative genomics · 2026Article
- Construction of a nomogram for preoperative prediction of occult peritoneal metastasis in advanced gastric cancer based on circulating tumor cells and fibrinogen to albumin ratio.Discover oncology · 2026Article
- An exosome-based liquid biopsy to predict molecular residual disease for the identification of high-risk patients with stage II-III colorectal cancer: the CLEAR study.Molecular cancer · 2026Observational
- Galectin-1 and peritoneal fibrosis: a novel predictor for peritoneal metastasis in gastric cancer.BMC gastroenterology · 2026Article
- Role of circulating tumor DNA methylation in gastric cancer initiation and progression: A comprehensive review.World journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2025Review
- Analysis of extracellular vesicles of frequently used colorectal cancer cell lines.BMC cancer · 2025Article
- Recent Exploration of Solid Cancer Biomarkers Hidden Within Urine or Blood Exosomes That Provide Fundamental Information for Future Cancer Diagnostics.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Letter to the Editor: Circulating Exosomal MicroRNA Signature Predicts Peritoneal Metastasis in Patients with Advanced Gastric Cancer.Annals of surgical oncology · 2025Article
- Recent progress in the study of exosomes in the gastric cancer immune microenvironment.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Review
- Reply: Circulating Exosomal MicroRNA Signature Predicts Peritoneal Metastasis in Patients with Advanced Gastric Cancer.Annals of surgical oncology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDespite a radical operation, about half of gastric cancer (GC) patients with advanced GC experience peritoneal metastasis (PM), and the patients with PM have a poor prognosis. However, because staging laparoscopy was a highly invasive procedure for patients, identification of PM using a liquid biopsy can be useful for patients with GC.
methodsThis study analyzed two genome-wide miRNA expression profiling datasets (GSE164174 and TCGA). The study prioritized biomarkers in pretreatment plasma specimens from clinical training and validation cohorts of patients with GC. The authors developed an integrated exosomal miRNA panel and established a risk-stratification model, which was combined with the miRNA panel and currently used tumor markers (CEA, CA19-9, CA125, and CA72-4 levels).
resultsThe comprehensive discovery effort identified a four-miRNA panel that robustly predicted the metastasis with excellent accuracy in the TCGA dataset (area under the curve [AUC] 0.86). A circulating exosomal miRNA panel was established successfully with remarkable diagnostic accuracy in the clinical training (AUC 0.85) and validation (AUC 0.86) cohorts. Moreover, the predictive accuracy of the panel was significantly superior to that of conventional clinical factors (P < 0.01), and the risk-stratification model was dramatically superior to the panel and currently used clinical factors for predicting PM (AUC 0.94; univariate: odds ratio [OR] 77.00 [P < 0.01]; multivariate OR 57.71 [P = 0.01]).
conclusionsThe novel risk-stratification model for predicting PM has potential for clinical translation as a liquid biopsy assay for patients with GC. The study findings highlight the potential clinical impact of the model for improved selection and management of patients with GC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
38951411What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.