ArticleInternational journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery2024
Generalisation capabilities of machine-learning algorithms for the detection of the subthalamic nucleus in micro-electrode recordings.
Article in International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The Role of MER Processing Pipelines for STN Functional Identification During DBS Surgery: A Feature-Based Machine Learning Approach.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeMicro-electrode recordings (MERs) are a key intra-operative modality used during deep brain stimulation (DBS) electrode implantation, which allow for a trained neurophysiologist to infer the anatomy in which the electrode is placed. As DBS targets are small, such inference is necessary to confirm that the electrode is correctly positioned. Recently, machine learning techniques have been used to augment the neurophysiologist's capability. The goal of this paper is to investigate the generalisability of these methods with respect to different clinical centres and training paradigms.
methodsFive deep learning algorithms for binary classification of MER signals have been implemented. Three databases from two different clinical centres have also been collected with differing size, acquisition hardware, and annotation protocol. Each algorithm has initially been trained on the largest database, then either directly tested or fine-tuned on the smaller databases in order to estimate their generalisability. As a reference, they have also been trained from scratch on the smaller databases as well in order to estimate the effect of the differing database sizes and annotation systems.
resultsEach network shows significantly reduced performance (on the order of a 6.5% to 16.0% reduction in balanced accuracy) when applied out-of-distribution. This reduction can be ameliorated through fine-tuning the network on the new database through transfer learning. Although, even for these small databases, it appears that retraining from scratch may still offer equivalent performance as fine-tuning with transfer learning. However, this is at the expense of significantly longer training times.
conclusionGeneralisability is an important criterion for the success of machine learning algorithms in clinic. We have demonstrated that a variety of recent machine learning algorithms for MER classification are negatively affected by domain shift, but that this can be quickly ameliorated through simple transfer learning procedures that can be readily performed for new centres.
Indexed as
Identifiers
38951363What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.