Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38951289›Full record

ReviewClinical rheumatology2024

Bridging distances and saving costs: insights from a pilot project of telerheumatology in a rural area of Pakistan.

Tayyeba Khursheed, Uzma Rasheed, Usman A Raza, Shazia Zammurrad, Mariam Islam, Wajahat Aziz, Muhammad Sharif

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical rheumatology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Expansion of Access to Rheumatology Care for Rural Veterans: Program Development and Initial Feasibility of the National Tele-Rheumatology Program Using the RE-AIM Framework.The Journal of rural health : official journal of the American Rural Health Association and the National Rural Health Care Association · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Tayyeba KhursheedDepartment of Rheumatology, Pakistan Institute of Medical Sciences, Islamabad, Pakistan.
Uzma RasheedDepartment of Rheumatology, Pakistan Institute of Medical Sciences, Islamabad, Pakistan.
Usman A RazaClaritas Rx, South San Fransisco, CA, USA.
Shazia ZammurradDepartment of Rheumatology, Pakistan Institute of Medical Sciences, Islamabad, Pakistan.
Mariam IslamDepartment of Rheumatology, Pakistan Institute of Medical Sciences, Islamabad, Pakistan.
Wajahat AzizDepartment of Rheumatology, Pakistan Institute of Medical Sciences, Islamabad, Pakistan.
Muhammad SharifDepartment of Rheumatology, Pakistan Institute of Medical Sciences, Islamabad, Pakistan. msharif111@yahoo.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9273-3046

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Enhancing access to healthcare remains a formidable challenge in rural regions of low- and lower-middle-income countries. Amid evolving healthcare challenges, telerheumatology provides opportunities to bridge gaps and expand access to rheumatology care, particularly in remote areas. We describe a pilot telerheumatology program and its cost-, time-, and travel-saving potential in a remote rural setting in northern Pakistan. The telerheumatology program commenced at the Pakistan Institute of Medical Sciences Islamabad, providing services through video consultations to a basic health unit in the Gilgit-Baltistan region. Patients visiting from the Gilgit-Baltistan region willing to participate were recruited in the program. Demographics and logistical metrics were recorded in a dedicated registry. A total of 533 consultations were carried out from April 2022 to April 2023. The majority of the patients were female (318/533, 59.7%). The median age of patients was 50 ± 15.7 years. The average wait time for consultation was 20 ± 13 min. The average travel time to reach telecentre was 59 ± 53 min. The average travel cost to reach telecentre was 379 ± 780 PKR (1.85 ± 3.81 USD). The average duration of consultation was 15 ± 5 min. The most common diagnosis for consultation was knee osteoarthritis (237, 44.5%), chronic low back pain (118, 22.1%), and rheumatoid arthritis (42, 7.9%). On average, patients saved 787 ± 29 km of distance, 15 ± 1 h of traveling, and 6702 ± 535 PKR (33 ± 3 USD) that would have been required to travel to our tertiary care hospital. Telerheumatology substantially reduced travel time, distance, and cost for patients. It has the potential to deliver outpatient rheumatology consultation in an economically efficient manner, effectively breaking geographical barriers and expanding access to essential services for patients in remote areas.

Indexed as

Health Services AccessibilityRheumatologyTelemedicineAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPakistanPilot ProjectsRemote ConsultationRheumatic DiseasesRural Health ServicesRural PopulationTravelAccess to careHealthcare disparitiesRheumatologyRural health servicesTelemedicine

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.