Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38951271›Full record

ArticleEJNMMI physics2024

Kinetic model-informed deep learning for multiplexed PET image separation.

Bolin Pan, Paul K Marsden, Andrew J Reader

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EJNMMI physics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Bolin PanSchool of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, UK. bolin.pan@kcl.ac.uk.
Paul K MarsdenSchool of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.
Andrew J ReaderSchool of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.

Funding

Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council EP/S032789/1Wellcome EPSRC Centre for Medical Engineering WT203148/Z/16/ZWellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMultiplexed positron emission tomography (mPET) imaging can measure physiological and pathological information from different tracers simultaneously in a single scan. Separation of the multiplexed PET signals within a single PET scan is challenging due to the fact that each tracer gives rise to indistinguishable 511 keV photon pairs, and thus no unique energy information for differentiating the source of each photon pair.

methodsRecently, many applications of deep learning for mPET image separation have been concentrated on pure data-driven methods, e.g., training a neural network to separate mPET images into single-tracer dynamic/static images. These methods use over-parameterized networks with only a very weak inductive prior. In this work, we improve the inductive prior of the deep network by incorporating a general kinetic model based on spectral analysis. The model is incorporated, along with deep networks, into an unrolled image-space version of an iterative fully 4D PET reconstruction algorithm.

resultsThe performance of the proposed method was evaluated on a simulated brain image dataset for dual-tracer [

conclusionsThis work proposes a kinetic model-informed unrolled deep learning method for mPET image separation. In simulation studies, the method proved able to outperform both the conventional v-MTCM method and a pure data-driven CED with less training data.

Indexed as

Kinetic modelingMultiplexed PETPhysics-informed deep learningSpectral analysis

Identifiers

PMID38951271
PMCPMC11555001

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.