ReviewCardiovascular and interventional radiology2024
Imaging of Deep Venous Pathology.
Review in Cardiovascular and interventional radiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cinematic rendering in CT angiography: a pictorial review of clinical applications.Insights into imaging · 2026Article
- Article
- Concomitant Venous Disease in Patients with Advanced Peripheral Arterial Disease: A Patient- and Limb-Level Analysis.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Endovascular Intervention Among Patients Complicated by Acute Inferior Deep Venous Thrombosis: A Single-Center Retrospective Cohort Study From Vietnam.International journal of vascular medicine · 2026Article
- A comparative study of stepping angiography and traditional segmental angiography in lower limb anterograde venography.The Journal of international medical research · 2025Article
- Intravascular Ultrasound Findings in Acute and Chronic Deep Vein Thrombosis of the Lower Extremities.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Emerging Elastic Micro-Nano Materials for Diagnosis and Treatment of Thrombosis.Research (Washington, D.C.) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Imaging plays an important role in the identification and assessment of clinically suspected venous pathology. The purpose of this article is to review the spectrum of image-based diagnostic tools used in the investigation of suspected deep vein disease, both obstructive (deep vein thrombosis and post-thrombotic vein changes) as well as insufficiency (e.g., compression syndromes and pelvic venous insufficiency). Additionally, specific imaging modalities are used for the treatment and during clinical follow-up. The use of duplex ultrasound, magnetic resonance venography, computed tomography venography and intravascular ultrasound as well as conventional venography will be discussed in this pictorial review.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.