ReviewDie Ophthalmologie2024
[The latest IC3D classification of corneal dystrophies-Overview and changes of the 3rd edition].
Review in Die Ophthalmologie, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- [Salzmann-like corneal deposits-A case series].Die Ophthalmologie · 2026Article
- [Bilateral ring-shaped stromal crystalline corneal deposits in an 8-year-old child].Die Ophthalmologie · 2026Article
- [Spontaneous course of a lattice corneal dystrophy with initially atypical corneal findings in childhood and a 10-year follow-up].Die Ophthalmologie · 2026Article
- Objective assessment of graft clarity and recurrence after penetrating keratoplasty for granular, lattice and macular corneal dystrophy using scheimpflug densitometry.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2026Article
- [Exacerbation of granular corneal dystrophy type 2 after laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK)].Die Ophthalmologie · 2026Article
- Genotype-Phenotype Correlations in Corneal Dystrophies: Advances in Molecular Genetics and Therapeutic Insights.Clinical & experimental ophthalmology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The International Committee on Classification of Corneal Dystrophies (IC3D) was founded in 2005 to address difficulties arising from the outdated nomenclature for corneal dystrophies (CD) and to correct misconceptions in the literature. For each of the 22 CDs, a separate template was created to represent the current clinical, pathological and genetic knowledge of the disease. In addition, each template contains representative clinical photographs as well as light and electron microscopic images and, if available, confocal microscopic and coherence tomographic images of the respective CD. After the first edition was published in 2008, the revised version followed in 2015. The third edition of the IC3D was published as open access in February 2024. The latest edition is intended to serve as a reference work in everyday clinical practice and facilitate the diagnosis of CD, which might sometimes be difficult. This article provides an overview of the diagnostic and treatment principles of CD and presents the IC3D and its changes over time.
Indexed as
Identifiers
38951244What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.