Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38951190›Full record

ArticleArchives of toxicology2024

Characterizing lipid constituents of B. moojeni snake venom: a comparative approach for chemical and biological investigations.

Nathalia Santos Carvalho, Viviani Nardini, Raul Moyses Veronezes, Jéssica Burlamaque Maciel, Amanda Cristina Trabuco, Mirian Félix De Carvalho, Caroline Fontanari, Marco Aurélio Sartim, Luiz Alberto Beraldo de Moraes, Lúcia Helena Faccioli

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of toxicology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Nathalia Santos Carvalho *Department of Clinical Analysis, Toxicology and Food Sciences, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences of Ribeirão Preto, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-4975-7197
Viviani Nardini *Department of Clinical Analysis, Toxicology and Food Sciences, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences of Ribeirão Preto, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-5092-3423
Raul Moyses VeronezesDepartment of Clinical Analysis, Toxicology and Food Sciences, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences of Ribeirão Preto, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID 0009-0009-4798-2658
Jéssica Burlamaque MacielDepartment of Clinical Analysis, Toxicology and Food Sciences, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences of Ribeirão Preto, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-0688-9483
Amanda Cristina TrabucoDepartment of Clinical Analysis, Toxicology and Food Sciences, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences of Ribeirão Preto, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-1512-1561
Mirian Félix De CarvalhoDepartment of Clinical Analysis, Toxicology and Food Sciences, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences of Ribeirão Preto, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-5925-4991
Caroline FontanariDepartment of Clinical Analysis, Toxicology and Food Sciences, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences of Ribeirão Preto, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-5611-5075
Marco Aurélio SartimGraduate Program in Tropical Medicine, Department of Teaching and Research, Dr. Heitor Vieira Dourado Tropical Medicine Foundation, Superior School of Health Sciences, Amazonas State University, Manaus, Amazonas, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-4572-3109
Luiz Alberto Beraldo de MoraesDepartment of Chemistry, Faculty of Philosophy, Sciences and Letters of Ribeirão Preto, University of Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-0853-1944
Lúcia Helena FaccioliDepartment of Clinical Analysis, Toxicology and Food Sciences, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences of Ribeirão Preto, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo, Brazil. faccioli@fcfrp.usp.br.ORCID 0000-0002-4999-8305

Funding

Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo 2021 / 123376National Council for Scientific and Technological Development 303259/2020-5National Council for Scientific and Technological Development 403066 / 2021-2
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Snake venoms are complex mixtures majorly composed of proteins with well-studied biological effects. However, the exploration of non-protein components, especially lipids, remains limited despite their potential for discovering bioactive molecules. This study compares three liquid-liquid lipid extraction methods for both chemical and biological analyses of Bothrops moojeni snake venom. The methods evaluated include the Bligh and Dyer method (methanol, chloroform, water), considered standard; the Acunha method, a modification of the Bligh and Dyer protocol; and the Matyash method (MTBE/methanol/water), featuring an organic phase less dense than the aqueous phase. Lipidomic analysis using liquid chromatography with high-resolution mass spectrometry (LC-HRMS) system revealed comparable values of lipid constituents' peak intensity across different extraction methods. Our results show that all methods effectively extracted a similar quantity of lipid species, yielding approximately 17-18 subclasses per method. However, the Matyash and Acunha methods exhibited notably higher proportions of biologically active lipids compared to the Bligh and Dyer method, particularly in extracting lipid species crucial for cellular structure and function, such as sphingomyelins and phosphatidylinositol-phosphate. In conclusion, when selecting a lipid extraction method, it is essential to consider the study's objectives. For a biological approach, it is crucial to evaluate not only the total quantity of extracted lipids but also their quality and biological activity. The Matyash and Acunha methods show promise in this regard, potentially offering a superior option for extracting biologically active lipids compared to the Bligh and Dyer method.

Indexed as

BothropsLipidomicsLipidsAnimalsChromatography, LiquidCrotalid VenomsLiquid-Liquid ExtractionMass SpectrometryCrotalid VenomsLipidsLipidomicsLiquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS)Liquid–liquid extraction (LLE)Venom

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.