Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38951163›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

The effect of elimination of gibbs ringing, noise and systematic errors on the DTI metrics and tractography in a rat brain.

Weronika Mazur-Rosmus, Artur T Krzyżak

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Multimodal Quantitative Parameter Mapping Characterizes Low-dimensional Feature Organization and Tract-specific Signatures in White Matter.Magnetic resonance in medical sciences : MRMS : an official journal of Japan Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Weronika Mazur-RosmusAGH University of Krakow, Al. Mickiewicza 30, 30-059, Krakow, Poland.
Artur T KrzyżakAGH University of Krakow, Al. Mickiewicza 30, 30-059, Krakow, Poland. akrzyzak@agh.edu.pl.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) metrics and tractography can be biased due to low signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and systematic errors resulting from image artifacts and imperfections in magnetic field gradients. The imperfections include non-uniformity and nonlinearity, effects caused by eddy currents, and the influence of background and imaging gradients. We investigated the impact of systematic errors on DTI metrics of an isotropic phantom and DTI metrics and tractography of a rat brain measured at high resolution. We tested denoising and Gibbs ringing removal methods combined with the B matrix spatial distribution (BSD) method for magnetic field gradient calibration. The results showed that the performance of the BSD method depends on whether Gibbs ringing is removed and the effectiveness of stochastic error removal. Region of interest (ROI)-based analysis of the DTI metrics showed that, depending on the size of the ROI and its location in space, correction methods can remove systematic bias to varying degrees. The preprocessing pipeline proposed and dedicated to this type of data together with the BSD method resulted in an even - 90% decrease in fractional anisotropy (FA) (globally and locally) in the isotropic phantom and - 45% in the rat brain. The largest global changes in the rat brain tractogram compared to the standard method without preprocessing (sDTI) were noticed after denoising. The direction of the first eigenvector obtained from DTI after denoising, Gibbs ringing removal and BSD differed by an average of 56 and 10 degrees in the ROI from sDTI and from sDTI after denoising and Gibbs ringing removal, respectively. The latter can be identified with the amount of improvement in tractography due to the elimination of systematic errors related to imperfect magnetic field gradients. Based on the results, the systematic bias for high resolution data mainly depended on SNR, but the influence of non-uniform gradients could also be seen. After denoising, the BSD method was able to further correct both the metrics and tractography of the diffusion tensor in the rat brain by taking into account the actual distribution of magnetic field gradients independent of the examined object and uniquely dependent on the scanner and sequence. This means that in vivo studies are also subject to this type of errors, which should be taken into account when processing such data.

Indexed as

ArtifactsBrainDiffusion Tensor ImagingPhantoms, ImagingSignal-To-Noise RatioAnimalsAnisotropyImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMaleRats

Identifiers

PMID38951163
PMCPMC11217413

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.