ArticleScientific reports2024
Learning from virtual experiments to assist users of Small Angle Neutron Scattering in model selection.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Learning from virtual experiments to assist users of Small Angle Neutron Scattering in model selection.Scientific reports · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In this work, we combine the advantages of virtual Small Angle Neutron Scattering (SANS) experiments carried out by Monte Carlo simulations with the recent advances in computer vision to generate a tool that can assist SANS users in small angle scattering model selection. We generate a dataset of almost 260.000 SANS virtual experiments of the SANS beamline KWS-1 at FRM-II, Germany, intended for Machine Learning purposes. Then, we train a recommendation system based on an ensemble of Convolutional Neural Networks to predict the SANS model from the two-dimensional scattering pattern measured at the position-sensitive detector of the beamline. The results show that the CNNs can learn the model prediction task, and that this recommendation system has a high accuracy in the classification task on 46 different SANS models. We also test the network with real data and explore the outcome. Finally, we discuss the reach of counting with the set of virtual experimental data presented here, and of such a recommendation system in the SANS user data analysis procedure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.