Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38951032›Full record

ArticleAJNR. American journal of neuroradiology2024

Optimal Endovascular Therapy Technique for Isolated Intracranial Atherothrombotic Stroke-Related Large-Vessel Occlusion in the Acute-to-Subacute Stage.

Mikiya Beppu, Kazutaka Uchida, Nobuyuki Sakai, Hiroshi Yamagami, Kazunori Toyoda, Yuji Matsumaru, Yasushi Matsumoto, Kenichi Todo, Mikito Hayakawa, Seigo Shindo and 15 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Association of perioperative P2YFrontiers in neurology · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

25 authors.

Mikiya BeppuFrom the Department of Neurosurgery (M.B., K.U., F.S., M.S., S.Y.), Hyogo Medical University, Nishinomiya, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-3484-5733
Kazutaka UchidaFrom the Department of Neurosurgery (M.B., K.U., F.S., M.S., S.Y.), Hyogo Medical University, Nishinomiya, Japan kuchidans@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0003-4780-9598
Nobuyuki SakaiNeurovascular Research & Neuroendovascular Therapy (N.S.), Kobe City Medical Center General Hospital, Kobe, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-3289-1210
Hiroshi YamagamiDepartment of Stroke Neurology (H.Y.), National Hospital Organization Osaka National Hospital, Osaka, Japan.
Kazunori ToyodaDepartment of Cerebrovascular Medicine (K. Toyoda., K.Tanaka), National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center, Suita, Japan.
Yuji MatsumaruDepartment of Neurosurgery (Y. Matsumara), Faculty of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-4827-8410
Yasushi MatsumotoDivision of Development and Discovery of Interventional Therapy (Y. Matsumoto), Tohoku University Hospital, Sendai, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-8372-356X
Kenichi TodoDepartment of Neurology (K.T.), Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Japan.
Mikito HayakawaDepartment of Neurology (M.H.), Institute of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan.
Seigo ShindoDepartment of Neurology (S.S.), Japanese Red Cross Kumamoto Hospital, Kumamoto, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-3876-2759
Shinzo OtaDepartment of Neurosurgery (S.O.), Brain Attack Center Ota Memorial Hospital, Fukuyama, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-9490-5577
Masafumi MorimotoDepartment of Neurosurgery (M.M.), Yokohama Shintoshi Neurosurgical Hospital, Kanagawa, Japan.
Masataka TakeuchiDepartment of Neurosurgery (M.T.), Seisho Hospital, Odawara, Japan.
Hirotoshi ImamuraDepartment of Neurosurgery (H. Imamura), National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center, Suita, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-8923-7861
Hiroyuki IkedaDepartment of Neurosurgery (H. Ikeda), Kurashiki Central Hospital, Kurashiki, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-5710-7456
Kanta TanakaDepartment of Cerebrovascular Medicine (K. Toyoda., K.Tanaka), National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center, Suita, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-3291-5083
Hideyuki IshiharaDepartment of Neurosurgery (H, Ishihara), Yamaguchi University School of Medicine, Ube, Japan.
Hiroto KakitaDepartment of Neurosurgery (H.K.), Shimizu Hospital, Kyoto, Japan.
Takanori SanoDepartment of Neurosurgery (T.S.), Japanese Red Cross Ise Hospital, Ise, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-7457-9607
Hayato ArakiDepartment of Neurosurgery (H.A.), Araki Neurosurgical Hospital, Hiroshima, Japan.
Tatsufumi NomuraNeuroendovasucular Therapy Center (T.N.), Ohkawara Neurosurgical Hospital, Muroran, Hokkaido, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-4121-2037
Fumihiro SakakibaraFrom the Department of Neurosurgery (M.B., K.U., F.S., M.S., S.Y.), Hyogo Medical University, Nishinomiya, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-5866-6743
Manabu ShirakawaFrom the Department of Neurosurgery (M.B., K.U., F.S., M.S., S.Y.), Hyogo Medical University, Nishinomiya, Japan.
Shinichi YoshimuraFrom the Department of Neurosurgery (M.B., K.U., F.S., M.S., S.Y.), Hyogo Medical University, Nishinomiya, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-3600-4842
RESCUE AT-LVO Investigators

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and purposeReocclusion after treatment is a concern in endovascular therapy for isolated intracranial atherothrombotic stroke-related large-vessel occlusion (AT-LVO). However, the optimal endovascular therapy technique for AT-LVO has not yet been investigated. This study evaluated the optimal endovascular therapy technique for AT-LVO in a real-world setting. MATERIALS AND

methodsWe conducted a historical, multicenter registry study at 51 centers that enrolled patients with AT-LVO. We divided the patients into 3 groups based on the endovascular therapy technique: mechanical thrombectomy alone, percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA), and stent deployment. Mechanical thrombectomy alone was classified into the mechanical thrombectomy-only group; PTA and mechanical thrombectomy-PTA, into the PTA group; and mechanical thrombectomy-stent deployment, mechanical thrombectomy-PTA-stent deployment, PTA-stent deployment, and stent deployment-only into the stent group. The primary outcome was incidence of reocclusion of the treated vessels within 90 days of endovascular therapy completion.

resultsWe enrolled 770 patients and analyzed 509 patients. The rates in the mechanical thrombectomy-only, PTA, and stent deployment groups were 40.7%, 44.4%, and 14.9%, respectively. Incidence rate of residual stenosis >70% of final angiography was significantly higher in the mechanical thrombectomy-only group than in the PTA and stent deployment groups (mechanical thrombectomy-only versus PTA versus stent deployment: 34.5% versus 26.3% versus 13.2%,

conclusionsIncidence rate of reocclusion was significantly lower in the PTA group than in the mechanical thrombectomy-only group. We found no meaningful difference in reocclusion rates between the stent deployment and mechanical thrombectomy-only groups. In Japan, glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors are not reimbursed. Therefore, PTA might be the preferred choice for AT-LVOs due to the higher reocclusion risk with mechanical thrombectomy-only. Reocclusion was likely to occur within 10 days, particularly within 2 days post-endovascular therapy.

Indexed as

Endovascular ProceduresRegistriesStentsThrombectomyAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansIntracranial ArteriosclerosisIntracranial ThrombosisMaleMiddle AgedStrokeTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID38951032
PMCPMC11543085

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.