ArticleBMJ open2024
Respiratory support with standard low-flow oxygen therapy, high-flow oxygen therapy or continuous positive airway pressure in adults with acute hypoxaemic respiratory failure in a resource-limited setting: protocol for a randomised, open-label, clinical trial - the Acute Respiratory Intervention StudiEs in Africa (ARISE-AFRICA) study.
Article in BMJ open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04693403 (A Multicentre, Randomized, Clinical Trial of Respiratory Support With Standard Low Flow Oxygen Therapy, Continuous Positive Airway Pressure, and High-flow Oxygen Therapy in Adults With Acute Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure in Uganda), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Multicentre, Randomized, Clinical Trial of Respiratory Support With Standard Low Flow Oxygen Therapy, Continuous Positive Airway Pressure, and High-flow Oxygen Therapy in Adults With Acute Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure in Uganda
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Medical oxygen and respiratory support requirements for patients hospitalised with COVID-19 in 23 low-income and middle-income countries: a prospective, observational cohort study.The Lancet. Global health · 2026Observational
- Advanced non-invasive respiratory support in resource-constrained settings: a narrative review.Critical care (London, England) · 2025Review
- Bridging the Gap: The Challenge of Conducting Clinical Trials in Sub-Saharan Africa.Anesthesia and analgesia · 2025Article
- Confronting Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure in Africa: If Not Now, When?Annals of the American Thoracic Society · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
rationaleAcute hypoxaemic respiratory failure (AHRF) is associated with high mortality in sub-Saharan Africa. This is at least in part due to critical care-related resource constraints including limited access to invasive mechanical ventilation and/or highly skilled acute care workers. Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) and high-flow oxygen by nasal cannula (HFNC) may prove useful to reduce intubation, and therefore, improve survival outcomes among critically ill patients, particularly in resource-limited settings, but data in such settings are lacking. The aim of this study is to determine whether CPAP or HFNC as compared with standard oxygen therapy, could reduce mortality among adults presenting with AHRF in a resource-limited setting.
methodsThis is a prospective, multicentre, randomised, controlled, stepped wedge trial, in which patients presenting with AHRF in Uganda will be randomly assigned to standard oxygen therapy delivered through a face mask, HFNC oxygen or CPAP. The primary outcome is all-cause mortality at 28 days. Secondary outcomes include the number of patients with criteria for intubation at day 7, the number of patients intubated at day 28, ventilator-free days at day 28 and tolerance of each respiratory support. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study has obtained ethical approval from the Research and Ethics Committee, School of Biomedical Sciences, College of Health Sciences, Makerere University as well as the Uganda National Council for Science and Technology. Patients will be included after informed consent. The results will be submitted for publication in peer-reviewed journals. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT04693403. PROTOCOL VERSION: 8 September 2023; version 5.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.