ArticleFacts, views & vision in ObGyn2024
Intravesical misplacement of vaginal contraceptive ring: a video report and review of the literature.
Article in Facts, views & vision in ObGyn, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The NuvaRing®, a hormonal vaginal contraceptive device, has gained widespread usage due to its favourable efficacy and safety profiles. Exceedingly rare instances of unintended misplacement in the bladder have been reported. This study presents a review of the literature and the first video report illustrating the extraction of an intravesical NuvaRing®, discussing diagnostic and therapeutic approaches. Objective: To illustrate an effective method for intravesical NuvaRing® retrieval and raise awareness about this unusual complication. Materials and Methods: A 27-year-old patient with low urinary tract symptoms related to NuvaRing® misplacement underwent diagnostic procedures, including ultrasound and diagnostic cystoscopy. A cystoscopic extraction under general anaesthesia was performed. Main outcome measures: The effectiveness of pelvic ultrasound for diagnosing an intravesical foreign body, successful cystoscopic removal of NuvaRing® from the bladder, and symptom resolution were assessed. Results: The intravesical NuvaRing® was identified through pelvic ultrasound. During cystoscopy, the ring was detected inside the bladder. Multiple attempts with cystoscopic alligator graspers were made; the NuvaRing® was eventually extracted using transurethral Heiss forceps. The patient experienced minimal blood loss and was discharged the following day, reporting relief from symptoms. Conclusions: Unintentional NuvaRing® placement in the bladder is an extremely rare event that healthcare providers should consider when patients present with urinary symptoms and pelvic pain. Pelvic ultrasound is an efficient diagnostic tool, possibly averting the need for further imaging techniques. Cystoscopy remains the preferred method for diagnosis and treatment. This video report illustrates an effective technique for NuvaRing ® extraction, especially when appropriate graspers are unavailable. Adequate instruction on NuvaRing® insertion should always be emphasised.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.