ArticlePediatric emergency care2025
Clinical Practice Guideline Development in Pediatric Emergency Medicine Departments Across the United States: A Cross-sectional Study.
Article in Pediatric emergency care, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Facilitators of and barriers to the clinical implementation of evidence-based nursing guidelines based on the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research: A multisite survey.International journal of nursing sciences · 2026Article
- Unravelling Education Needs for Clinical Practice Guideline Development: A Survey Performed in the Netherlands.Journal of evaluation in clinical practice · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveThis cross-sectional study aimed to assess the process of clinical practice guideline (CPG) development in pediatric emergency medicine departments (PEDs) across the United States, with a focus on identifying areas for improvement to enhance the quality of CPGs.
methodsAn electronic survey was distributed to PEDs with pediatric emergency medicine fellowship programs. Respondents were asked about their CPG development processes (ie, guideline committee composition, consideration of conflicts of interest, grading recommendations, guideline training opportunities) based on the Appraisal of Guidelines, Research, and Evaluation (AGREE II) tool as well as implementation and monitoring. Univariate analysis was used to assess associations between the number of AGREE II elements adhered to and annual patient volume.
resultsOf the 84 PEDs surveyed, 44 (52.4%) responded, representing institutions from 28 states. Most PEDs (97.7%, n = 43) reported developing their own guidelines, citing the need to improve care quality and standardize patient care as primary reasons. Although most guideline committees included multidisciplinary team members (74.4%, n = 32), routine patient involvement in committees was rare (11.6%, n = 5), and barriers such as time and resource constraints hindered their inclusion. Formal training for committee members in guideline development was uncommon (18.6%, n = 8). There was an association between higher annual patient volume and the number of AGREE II elements adhered to ( P = 0.03). Few PEDs considered potential conflicts of interest among committee members (13.6%, n = 6). Over half of surveyed PEDs (54.5%, n = 24) lacked a systematic approach to grading recommendations. Educational materials and workshops were the most common guideline implementation strategies.
conclusionsOur findings highlight need for improvement in the CPG development process in PEDs. Including patients in committees, providing formal training for committee members, and adopting a rigorous approach to grading recommendations are crucial steps toward enhancing guideline quality. Emphasizing these improvements has the potential to improve the quality of CPGs for pediatric emergency care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.