ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2024
The chronology of the human colonization of the Canary Islands.
Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- The extension of the taxon cycle model to island plants: insights from the Canarian vascular flora.Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · 2026Article
- Contrasting vulnerability profiles for insular assemblages of birds and mammals facing global change.Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology · 2026Article
- Decomposing in the dark. Experimental approaches to funerary archaeoentomology in volcanic caves.Forensic science international. Synergy · 2026Article
- Isotopic evidence for human adaptation to island environments in the Canary Islands during the Amazigh period.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Article
- Beyond the Terrestrial Narrative: Re-Evaluating the Ancient Coastal Lifestyle in Fuerteventura Through Fish Remains.Journal of maritime archaeology · 2026Article
- Paleogenomic evidence on the temporal continuity of indigenous goat exploitation in the Canary Islands.iScience · 2025Article
- Stress, Life History, and Linear Enamel Hypoplasia: Insights From the Indigenous Populations of the Canary Islands.American journal of biological anthropology · 2025Article
- A synthesis of terrestrial species extinctions in the Macaronesian Islands and their correspondence with human occupancy.PNAS nexus · 2025Review
- Climate, biogeography, and human resilience in the demographic history of the Canary Islands during the Amazigh period.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Food Globalization in the Early Modern Period: Isotopic Evidence of Maize Introduction and Dietary Diversification on Gran Canaria, Canary Islands, Spain (16th-18th CE).American journal of biological anthropology · 2025Article
- The chronology of the human colonization of the Canary Islands.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The human colonization of the Canary Islands represents the sole known expansion of Berber communities into the Atlantic Ocean and is an example of marine dispersal carried out by an African population. While this island colonization shows similarities to the populating of other islands across the world, several questions still need to be answered before this case can be included in wider debates regarding patterns of initial colonization and human settlement, human-environment interactions, and the emergence of island identities. Specifically, the chronology of the first human settlement of the Canary Islands remains disputed due to differing estimates of the timing of its first colonization. This absence of a consensus has resulted in divergent hypotheses regarding the motivations that led early settlers to migrate to the islands, e.g., ecological or demographic. Distinct motivations would imply differences in the strategies and dynamics of colonization; thus, identifying them is crucial to understanding how these populations developed in such environments. In response, the current study assembles a comprehensive dataset of the most reliable radiocarbon dates, which were used for building Bayesian models of colonization. The findings suggest that i) the Romans most likely discovered the islands around the 1st century BCE; ii) Berber groups from western North Africa first set foot on one of the islands closest to the African mainland sometime between the 1st and 3rd centuries CE; iii) Roman and Berber societies did not live simultaneously in the Canary Islands; and iv) the Berber people rapidly spread throughout the archipelago.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.