Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38950359›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2024

Growing three-dimensional objects with light.

Gabriel Lipkowitz, Max A Saccone, Matthew A Panzer, Ian A Coates, Kaiwen Hsiao, Daniel Ilyn, Jason M Kronenfeld, John R Tumbleston, Eric S G Shaqfeh, Joseph M DeSimone

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. 4D injection molding.Nature communications · 2026
    Article
  3. Biomass valorization using 3D-printed catalysts.Communications chemistry · 2025
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Imaging-Guided Microscale Photothermal Stereolithography Bioprinting.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Gabriel Lipkowitz *Department of Mechanical Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305.ORCID 0000-0003-4869-6804
Max A Saccone *Department of Chemical Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305.ORCID 0000-0003-3846-2908
Matthew A PanzerCarbon, Inc., Redwood City, CA 94063.ORCID 0000-0001-9422-2138
Ian A CoatesDepartment of Chemical Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305.ORCID 0000-0002-8853-1505
Kaiwen HsiaoDepartment of Chemical Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305.
Daniel IlynDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305.
Jason M KronenfeldDepartment of Chemistry, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305.ORCID 0000-0002-3026-2736
John R TumblestonCarbon, Inc., Redwood City, CA 94063.
Eric S G ShaqfehDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305.ORCID 0000-0001-8241-2946
Joseph M DeSimoneDepartment of Chemical Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305.

Funding

Computational model-driven design to mitigate vein graft failure after coronary artery bypassR01HL159954 · NHLBI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI HUMPHREY, JAY D., MARSDEN, ALISON L · 2022 to 2025
$2.7M
Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation (GF) INV-046940HHS | National Institutes of Health (NIH) 5123951-A01HHS | National Institutes of Health (NIH) RHL159954AHHS | NIH | Advanced Research Projects Agency for Health (ARPA-H) 1AY1AX000002-01NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL159954NSF | National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship Program (GRFP) DGE-1656518SU | Stanford Precourt Institute for Energy MitraPP-EECSU | Wu Tsai Human Performance Alliance WTHPA-2022-013Wellcome Leap SoW #3Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Vat photopolymerization (VP) additive manufacturing enables fabrication of complex 3D objects by using light to selectively cure a liquid resin. Developed in the 1980s, this technique initially had few practical applications due to limitations in print speed and final part material properties. In the four decades since the inception of VP, the field has matured substantially due to simultaneous advances in light delivery, interface design, and materials chemistry. Today, VP materials are used in a variety of practical applications and are produced at industrial scale. In this perspective, we trace the developments that enabled this printing revolution by focusing on the enabling themes of light, interfaces, and materials. We focus on these fundamentals as they relate to continuous liquid interface production (CLIP), but provide context for the broader VP field. We identify the fundamental physics of the printing process and the key breakthroughs that have enabled faster and higher-resolution printing, as well as production of better materials. We show examples of how in situ print process monitoring methods such as optical coherence tomography can drastically improve our understanding of the print process. Finally, we highlight areas of recent development such as multimaterial printing and inorganic material printing that represent the next frontiers in VP methods.

Indexed as

3D printingadditive manufacturingcomputational fabrication

Identifiers

PMID38950359
PMCPMC11252790

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.