ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2024
DeepGSEA: explainable deep gene set enrichment analysis for single-cell transcriptomic data.
Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Single-cell marker gene clustering: A unified deep learning framework for marker gene-based clustering of single-cell RNA-sequencing data.Quantitative biology (Beijing, China) · 2026Article
- Molecular Mechanisms of Tibetan Medicinal Sea Buckthorn in the Treatment of Pulmonary Diseases: An Integrated Analysis of Network Pharmacology and Transcriptomics.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Progress in the Application of Machine Learning in the Field of Single-Cell and Spatial Transcriptomics.Genes · 2026Review
- Exploring Mitochondrial Autophagy Dysregulation in Osteosarcoma: Its Implications for Prognosis and Targeted Therapy.Combinatorial chemistry & high throughput screening · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
motivationGene set enrichment (GSE) analysis allows for an interpretation of gene expression through pre-defined gene set databases and is a critical step in understanding different phenotypes. With the rapid development of single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) technology, GSE analysis can be performed on fine-grained gene expression data to gain a nuanced understanding of phenotypes of interest. However, with the cellular heterogeneity in single-cell gene profiles, current statistical GSE analysis methods sometimes fail to identify enriched gene sets. Meanwhile, deep learning has gained traction in applications like clustering and trajectory inference in single-cell studies due to its prowess in capturing complex data patterns. However, its use in GSE analysis remains limited, due to interpretability challenges.
resultsIn this paper, we present DeepGSEA, an explainable deep gene set enrichment analysis approach which leverages the expressiveness of interpretable, prototype-based neural networks to provide an in-depth analysis of GSE. DeepGSEA learns the ability to capture GSE information through our designed classification tasks, and significance tests can be performed on each gene set, enabling the identification of enriched sets. The underlying distribution of a gene set learned by DeepGSEA can be explicitly visualized using the encoded cell and cellular prototype embeddings. We demonstrate the performance of DeepGSEA over commonly used GSE analysis methods by examining their sensitivity and specificity with four simulation studies. In addition, we test our model on three real scRNA-seq datasets and illustrate the interpretability of DeepGSEA by showing how its results can be explained. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: https://github.com/Teddy-XiongGZ/DeepGSEA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.