Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38949998›Full record

ArticlePLOS digital health2024

Geographical validation of the Smart Triage Model by age group.

Cherri Zhang, Matthew O Wiens, Dustin Dunsmuir, Yashodani Pillay, Charly Huxford, David Kimutai, Emmanuel Tenywa, Mary Ouma, Joyce Kigo, Stephen Kamau and 8 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLOS digital health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Cherri ZhangInstitute for Global Health, BC Children's and Women's Hospitals, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7059-4922
Matthew O WiensInstitute for Global Health, BC Children's and Women's Hospitals, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3287-5181
Dustin DunsmuirInstitute for Global Health, BC Children's and Women's Hospitals, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Yashodani PillayInstitute for Global Health, BC Children's and Women's Hospitals, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Charly HuxfordInstitute for Global Health, BC Children's and Women's Hospitals, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
David KimutaiMbagathi County Hospital, Nairobi, Kenya.
Emmanuel TenywaJinja Regional Referral Hospital, Jinja, Uganda.
Mary OumaMbagathi County Hospital, Nairobi, Kenya.
Joyce KigoHealth Services Unit, KEMRI-Wellcome Trust Research Program, Nairobi, Kenya.
Stephen KamauHealth Services Unit, KEMRI-Wellcome Trust Research Program, Nairobi, Kenya.
Mary ChegeDepartment of Pediatrics, Kiambu County Referral Hospital, Kiambu, Kenya.
Nathan Kenya-MugishaWorld Alliance for Lung and Intensive Care Medicine in Uganda, Kampala, Uganda.
Savio MwakaWorld Alliance for Lung and Intensive Care Medicine in Uganda, Kampala, Uganda.
Guy A DumontDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Pharmacology & Therapeutics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Niranjan KissoonBC Children's Hospital Research Institute, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Samuel AkechHealth Services Unit, KEMRI-Wellcome Trust Research Program, Nairobi, Kenya.
J Mark AnserminoInstitute for Global Health, BC Children's and Women's Hospitals, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8427-2035
Pediatric Sepsis CoLab

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Infectious diseases in neonates account for half of the under-five mortality in low- and middle-income countries. Data-driven algorithms such as clinical prediction models can be used to efficiently detect critically ill children in order to optimize care and reduce mortality. Thus far, only a handful of prediction models have been externally validated and are limited to neonatal in-hospital mortality. The aim of this study is to externally validate a previously derived clinical prediction model (Smart Triage) using a combined prospective baseline cohort from Uganda and Kenya with a composite endpoint of hospital admission, mortality, and readmission. We evaluated model discrimination using area under the receiver-operator curve (AUROC) and visualized calibration plots with age subsets (< 30 days, ≤ 2 months, ≤ 6 months, and < 5 years). Due to reduced performance in neonates (< 1 month), we re-estimated the intercept and coefficients and selected new thresholds to maximize sensitivity and specificity. 11595 participants under the age of five (under-5) were included in the analysis. The proportion with an endpoint ranged from 8.9% in all children under-5 (including neonates) to 26% in the neonatal subset alone. The model achieved good discrimination for children under-5 with AUROC of 0.81 (95% CI: 0.79-0.82) but poor discrimination for neonates with AUROC of 0.62 (95% CI: 0.55-0.70). Sensitivity at the low-risk thresholds (CI) were 85% (83%-87%) and 68% (58%-76%) for children under-5 and neonates, respectively. After model revision for neonates, we achieved an AUROC of 0.83 (95% CI: 0.79-0.87) with 13% and 41% as the low- and high-risk thresholds, respectively. The updated Smart Triage performs well in its predictive ability across different age groups and can be incorporated into current triage guidelines at local healthcare facilities. Additional validation of the model is indicated, especially for the neonatal model.

Identifiers

PMID38949998
PMCPMC11216563

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.