Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38949745›Full record

SynthesisAnnals of dyslexia2024

The relation between reading and externalizing behavior: a correlational meta-analysis.

Sage E Pickren, Jessica N Torelli, Anna H Miller, Jason C Chow

Abstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Annals of dyslexia, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Sage E PickrenDepartment of Special Education, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA. Sage.pickren@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0001-8646-1120
Jessica N TorelliDepartment of Communication Sciences and Special Education, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0779-8257
Anna H MillerDepartment of Special Education, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1541-1251
Jason C ChowDepartment of Special Education, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2878-7410

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Reading proficiency is important because it has life-long consequences and influences success in other academic areas. Many students with behavior problems are poor readers and many students with learning disabilities have more behavior problems than their typical peers. We conducted a correlational meta-analysis to examine the association between reading and externalizing behavior in students ages 5-12. We identified 33 studies that reported 88 effect sizes. Using a random-effects linear regression model with robust variance estimation, we found a significant, negative correlation (r= -0.1698, SE = 0.01, p < 0.0001) between reading and externalizing behavior. We tested several moderators related to measurement and sample characteristics. We found that rater type, behavior dimension (e.g., aggression), time between longitudinal measurement points, age of the sample, and percentage male of the sample moderated the relation between reading and behavior. Whether the reading assessment measured comprehension or word reading and socioeconomic status of the sample did not moderate the relation. Understanding the association between reading and externalizing behavior has implications for disability identification and intervention practices for children in elementary school. Future research should examine shared cognitive factors and environmental influences that explain the relation between the constructs.

Indexed as

ReadingChildChild, PreschoolDyslexiaFemaleHumansMaleProblem BehaviorElementaryExternalizing behaviorMeta-analysisReading

Identifiers

PMID38949745
PMCPMC11249710

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.