Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38949188›Full record

ArticleInternational wound journal2024

Scar outcomes for conservatively managed children post burn injury: A retrospective study.

Stephanie Ball, Stephanie Wicks, Rhianydd Thomas, Claire Toose, Kelly Gray, Verity Pacey

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International wound journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Stephanie BallMacquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Stephanie WicksThe Children's Hospital at Westmead, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Rhianydd ThomasMacquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Claire TooseThe Children's Hospital at Westmead, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Kelly GrayMacquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Verity PaceyMacquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

Funding

Macquarie University 20203517
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hypertrophic scarring is a significant complication post burn injury, especially for delayed healing after 3 weeks. Burn injuries healing prior to 3 weeks also have the potential to develop hypertrophic scarring, even when prescribed prophylactic conservative scar interventions. A retrospective chart audit reviewed 326 burn patients treated at a paediatric tertiary hospital from 2014 to 2019 who sustained a partial thickness burn, healed >14 days and did not receive skin grafting. A scar was deemed hypertrophic if >1 mm in height. Early hypertrophic scar prevalence was defined as 3-6 months post burn, while persistent hypertrophic scarring was defined as 12-18 months post burn. Median days to wound closure was 18. The prevalence of early and persistent hypertrophic scarring was 56.1% and 16.3%, respectively. Seventeen (5.2%) children underwent medical interventions for scar modulation. Early signs of hypertrophic scarring were seen in just over half the patients presenting to burn therapy and despite scar intervention, persistent hypertrophic scarring was seen in 16.3%. At both time points, just over half of the children presenting healed between 14 and 21 days. Therefore, children healing prior to 21 days have potential to develop hypertrophic scarring.

Indexed as

BurnsCicatrix, HypertrophicWound HealingAdolescentChildChild, PreschoolConservative TreatmentFemaleHumansInfantMaleRetrospective StudiesTreatment Outcomeburnscicatrixhypertrophicpaediatricsprevalencere‐epithelialization

Identifiers

PMID38949188
PMCPMC11215673

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.