Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38949186›Full record

ArticleMaternal & child nutrition2024

Perinatal intervention strategies providing food with micronutrients to pregnant and breastfeeding women in low- and middle-income countries: A scoping review.

Christine M McDonald, K Ryan Wessells, Christine P Stewart, Kathryn G Dewey, Saskia de Pee, Ritu Rana, Hajra Hafeez-Ur-Rehman, Martin N Mwangi, Sonja Y Hess

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Maternal & child nutrition, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Christine M McDonaldDepartments of Pediatrics, and Epidemiology & Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1231-9003
K Ryan WessellsInstitute for Global Nutrition and Department of Nutrition, University of California, Davis, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5485-7144
Christine P StewartInstitute for Global Nutrition and Department of Nutrition, University of California, Davis, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4575-8571
Kathryn G DeweyInstitute for Global Nutrition and Department of Nutrition, University of California, Davis, California, USA.
Saskia de PeeNutrition Division, World Food Programme HQ, Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-0138-7118
Ritu RanaNutrition Division, World Food Programme HQ, Rome, Italy.
Hajra Hafeez-Ur-RehmanNutrition Division, World Food Programme HQ, Rome, Italy.
Martin N MwangiMicronutrient Forum, Washington, DC, USA.
Sonja Y HessInstitute for Global Nutrition and Department of Nutrition, University of California, Davis, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4661-277X

Funding

World Food Programme HQ22NF655-WV
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In resource-constrained settings, pregnant and breastfeeding women and girls (PBW/G) are particularly vulnerable to undernutrition. Micronutrient-fortified balanced energy protein (BEP) supplementation may be provided to boost maternal nutritional status and improve birth and infant outcomes. We conducted a scoping review of the published literature to determine the impact of BEP and other related nutrition interventions that provided fortified food or cash along with a minimum of 3 micronutrients on maternal, birth, and infant/child outcomes in low- and middle-income countries. We conducted a PubMed search using pre-defined keywords and controlled vocabulary search terms. All titles and abstracts were reviewed for eligibility by two independent reviewers, and data were extracted according to outcome type. We identified 149 eligible research articles that reported on a total of 21 trials and/or programme evaluations which assessed the health impact of one or more products (fortified lipid-based nutrient supplement [LNS, n = 12], fortified blended flours [n = 5], milk-based beverages [n = 2], and local food/snacks [n = 3]) that provided 118-750 kcal/day and varying levels of protein and micronutrients. Only one of these programme evaluations assessed the impact of the provision of cash and fortified food. Effects on maternal outcomes such as gestational weight gain and duration of gestation were promising but inconsistent. Birth outcomes were reported in 15 studies, and the effects on birthweight and birth length were generally positive. Seven studies demonstrated sustained benefits on infant and child growth out of the 15 studies that reported at least one of these outcomes, although data were sparse. Additional research is needed to investigate issues of dose, cost-effectiveness, and incorporation into multi-component interventions.

Indexed as

Breast FeedingDeveloping CountriesFood, FortifiedMicronutrientsDietary SupplementsFemaleHumansInfantInfant, NewbornMaternal Nutritional Physiological PhenomenaNutritional StatusPregnancyMicronutrientsantenatal nutritionbalanced energy proteinlactationLNSmaternal nutritionperinatal nutritionpregnancyundernutrition

Identifiers

PMID38949186
PMCPMC11574661

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.