Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38949176›Full record

ArticleInternational wound journal2024

Nurses' experiences of hospital-acquired pressure injury prevention in acute healthcare services in Victoria, Australia: A qualitative study using the Theoretical Domains Framework.

Victoria Team, Ayoub Bouguettaya, Yunjing Qiu, Louise Turnour, Jane C Banaszak-Holl, Carolina D Weller, Geoffrey Sussman, Angela Jones, Helena Teede

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International wound journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Victoria TeamSchool of Nursing and Midwifery, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6615-6874
Ayoub BouguettayaSchool of Nursing and Midwifery, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.
Yunjing QiuSchool of Nursing and Midwifery, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.
Louise TurnourSchool of Nursing and Midwifery, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.
Jane C Banaszak-HollDepartment of Health Services Administrations, School of Health Professions, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6896-600X
Carolina D WellerSchool of Nursing and Midwifery, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8016-1060
Geoffrey SussmanAustin Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Angela JonesMonash Partners Academic Health Science Centre, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.
Helena TeedeMonash Partners Academic Health Science Centre, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7609-577X

Funding

Department of Health and Aged Care, Australian Government 9100003
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We investigated nurses' experiences of hospital-acquired pressure injury (PI) prevention in acute care services to better understand how PI prevention may be optimised. We used the Theoretical Domains Framework to systematically identify barriers and enablers to evidence-based preventive practices as required by the International Guideline. This study was one element of a complex capacity building project on PI surveillance and prevention within the acute health service partners of Monash Partners Academic Health Science Centre, an accredited academic health partnership located in Melbourne, Australia. We adopted a qualitative descriptive design. We interviewed 32 nurses that provided care in intensive care units, general wards and COVID wards of four acute care services. Nurses were recruited from four large acute care services (three public, one private) located in Melbourne. Most of them worked with patients who were at high risk of hospital-acquired PI on a daily basis. Interview transcripts were coded and analysed using thematic analysis guided by the Theoretical Domains Framework. The domains referred to most frequently by all participants included: Knowledge, Skills, Social/Professional Role and Identity, Beliefs about Capabilities, and Environmental Context and Resources. The key barriers discussed by nurses included gaps in nurses' knowledge and skills related to identification and staging of PI, heavy nursing workload and inadequate staffing levels, stigma and self-blame related to PI identification, and exacerbating impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic. Main facilitators discussed were training programmes, nursing audits and feedback, and teamwork. Participants suggested improvements including accessible and tailored training, visual reminders, and addressing heavy workloads and emotional barriers nurses face. Investing in tailored training initiatives to improve nurses' knowledge and organisational changes to address low level staffing and heavy workloads are urgently needed to support nurses in delivering optimal care and preventing hospital-acquired PI.

Indexed as

Pressure UlcerQualitative ResearchAdultAttitude of Health PersonnelCOVID-19FemaleHumansIatrogenic DiseaseMaleMiddle AgedNursing Staff, HospitalVictoriacoronavirushospitalsinterviewnursespressure ulcer

Identifiers

PMID38949176
PMCPMC11215697

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.